Security Flaw Placed 30 Years of DNA Evidence at Risk of Hacking

Researchers found that widely used lab machines produced digital DNA files that are vulnerable to tampering

By Mariah Timms for the Wall Street Journal

August 6, 2026

A security weakness in the technology used by most of the nation’s crime labs to analyze DNA evidence exposed 30 years of crime files to the risk of being hacked, according to a group of forensic and computer scientists.

The researchers found that with the help of computer code written by widely available AI software, they could alter the data produced from computerized scans of physical DNA evidence without leaving any trace they had tampered with the records. The vulnerability is likely to have existed in the digital files produced by crime-lab machines since 1995, but recent technological advances make potential tampering much easier now, they said.

“Effectively, what we have are data files that are legitimately referred to as the gold standard of forensic science that lack the same level of tamper-evident markings that we require for a paper bag,” said Laura Gaydosh Combs, a forensic scientist and University of New Haven professor who worked on the research.

The company that makes the crime-lab equipment used in a majority of facilities, Thermo Fisher Scientific, privately acknowledged the vulnerability in July and indicated it was working on a fix, according to messages reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The researchers flagged the security threat in May.

After being contacted by the Journal, the company on Friday issued a security bulletin, labeled high severity, that warned of “a risk for nearly undetectable modification” of certain files “if laboratory controls are circumvented.”

The company in a separate note to customers emphasized that there were no known instances where the vulnerability had been exploited.

“We have been working closely with the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency since the software issue was raised,” the company said in a statement to the Journal. “We appreciate the work of forensic researchers on this topic, and we have released a software update that implements the use of digital signatures to add an extra layer of protection that moving forward will help customers verify that data files have not been modified.”

While there is no evidence that bad actors have exploited the security weakness to hack files, the researchers said they haven’t found a way to detect tampering if it had happened. Someone with an intent to corrupt the digital evidence files would need local or remote access to a lab’s servers and enough know-how about the way DNA testing works. The vulnerability doesn’t impact the physical DNA material submitted for testing.

DNA evidence is a central and reliable part of criminal investigations and prosecutions, but there have been occasional worries about tampering. In Colorado, a state forensic analyst pleaded guilty in June to four felonies after prosecutors alleged she manipulated evidence and engaged in a variety of misconduct from 2008 to 2023.

For decades, lab machines have taken physical DNA evidence and produced digital analysis files. The threat of tampering with those files has grown since the rise of AI technology that lets amateurs create tools they might not previously have had the skills to develop, the researchers said. In theory, a sophisticated attack could add or remove DNA profiles after crime-scene evidence is scanned, creating the impression a suspect wasn’t at the scene or an innocent person was.

Nathan Adams, a systems engineer at Forensic Bioinformatics, an Ohio-based DNA consulting company, began testing the issue earlier this year, using a public data set of DNA files.

Using Anthropic’s Claude, Adams said his first success at changing a file took about 45 minutes.

Some file types have a higher level of encryption, but Adams said a little bit of research led him to a decryption key that has been on the internet for years.

In a test viewed by the Journal, Adams’s code was able to combine the scans of two individual DNA profiles into a new file that appeared untouched since 2015. The modified file raised no red flags in the analysis software many labs use.

It isn’t clear whether the security vulnerability will affect pending or past prosecutions. Defense attorneys regularly mount challenges to DNA collection and analysis in their cases. Such evidence is a common feature in criminal trials, though most people aren’t convicted or exonerated on DNA evidence alone.

Sarah Chu, the director of policy and reform at the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice, who worked on the project, said the research highlights lagging protocols “in a system where life and liberty are at stake.”

There is no central, national regulator in forensic science, she said, leading to a patchwork of security measures at the more than 200 labs that handle everything from forensic evidence to paternity tests.

“Lessons learned from other industries haven’t been imported into forensic science in a serious way,” Chu said. “We’ve been behind the ball for so long. That kind of all rolls downhill into this incident.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ICE killed a man on the sidewalk. Texans are honoring him with ‘I Voted’ stickers.

Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was killed during a controversial immigration enforcement operation in July. Early voters are visiting the scene to show he hasn’t been forgotten.

By Molly Hennessy-Fiske for the Washington Post

October 30, 2026

HOUSTON — For almost four months, the sidewalk where Lorenzo Salgado Araujo died has served as an evolving shrine to the memory of a Latino working man: a jersey from his favorite Mexican soccer team , bottles of Modelo beer and red Gatorade, orange and yellow marigolds, skull-emblazoned votive candles and Virgin of Guadalupe statues draped with glinting rosaries.

Recently, the memorial to the 52-year-old builder and father of three sons has featured a new decoration: “I Voted” stickers. Now, there’s hundreds of them.

In a state that serves as the frontline of the Trump administration’s controversial efforts to deport hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants, the shooting of Salgado Araujo by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in early July is playing a role in turning out voters for competitive midterm elections that could decide the balance of power in Congress and are widely seen as a referendum on the president’s policies.

“I Voted” stickers began appearing at the memorial on Oct. 19, the day early voting started in Texas, when Salgado Araujo’s oldest son, Ronaldo, visited the scene and placed his sticker on the wall.

“I am beyond touched that this community and that the entire city is voting with my dad in mind,” the 29-year-old teacher said during a visit to the memorial days later, when scores more stickers had already appeared. “I didn’t realize it would grow this big.”

Texas’s major cities have seen historic early voting turnout in recent days, including what officials described as a surge in places like the majority Latino Magnolia Park precinct where Salgado Araujo was killed.

Next to stickers on the memorial, voters have written messages of hope for the midterms: “We voted for a better future,” “Don’t tell someone that you love them & vote for people that hurt them,” “Avenge with your vote” and “Voting for those who can’t vote — daughter of an immigrant.”

On Wednesday afternoon, Mexican immigrant José Trinidad Rojas Pliego added a bouquet to the growing memorial honoring his late boss.

“All the people are supportive,” said Rojas Pliego, 51, as his wife added her voter sticker to hundreds adorning the sign that said “We are Lorenzo.”

Salgado Araujo had lived in the U.S. for almost 35 years, his family said, and was working with lawyers to acquire a work permit when he was shot.

“I hope there will be justice,” Rojas Pliego said.

“He’s looking down on everybody supporting him and voting in his memory due to the tragedy,” said Rojas Pliego’s wife, Apolonia Martinez, wearing a T-shirt that said “MAGA: Mexicans Ain’t Going Anywhere.”

“We need a change for all the immigrants.”

Rojas Pliego recalled the moments on July 7 when an ICE agent opened fire on their work van, fatally striking Salgado Araujo through the window.

“They didn’t have lights or anything. The bullet passed right by me,” Rojas Pliego said on Wednesday, pointing to his side.

He gestured to a nearby barbershop parking lot where he said agents cuffed his hands and feet, detaining him and two other workers who had been in the van.

ICE and the Department of Homeland Security claimed the agent fired in self-defense after Salgado Araujo ignored commands and attempted to ram an agency vehicle. Rojas Pliego and family attorneys insisted the agent fired immediately without warning and that no officers were in front of the van. State and federal agencies are investigating, but none of the agents have been charged.

“They shot him but they put us in jail. Why didn’t they jail him?” Rojas Pliego said of Salgado Araujo.

Rojas Pliego was released from detention after a month and went straight to the memorial to pay his respects. He testified last month before a Harris County grand jury considering the ICE shooting that’s expected to decide whether an indictment is merited next month. He now wears an ankle monitor, and said federal officials are still trying to deport him. He applied for a U visa issued to crime victims who assist with prosecutions. The process could take years.

Rojas Pliego said he’s struggling to find work. Coming to the memorial was a priority.

He attached a handwritten note to his bouquet:

“Although I cannot vote, my wife cast her vote with you in mind, Lorenzo, and for everyone who has lost a loved one to ICE. May we never lack the humanity to stand up for our fellow human beings.”

Democratic County Commissioner Adrian Garcia, the former sheriff who represents the area and who met with Salgado Araujo’s family after the shooting, visited the memorial near day’s end to add his sticker.

He noted the spike in early voter turnout, driven in part by an increase in Latino first-time voters and “sporadic” voters likely motivated by the shooting. Texas has been a majority-minority state for years but Latino leaders have struggled to turn out voters locally and statewide.

“This election is about demonstrating that a community can lift its voice up and cause change,” Garcia said. “In this particular area the Hispanic vote has the potential to outpace all other communities for the first time. I think it’s because of Lorenzo.”

A steady stream of voters added their stickers to the memorial Wednesday. Austin Galvan, 27, came at the urging of his uncle, who had already visited days earlier with his great-uncle — three generations of stickers.

Galvan said he’d been encouraged to see his nearby polling place “a lot more packed than it usually is.” He said Salgado Araujo’s shooting “has gotten a lot of people to care who otherwise wouldn’t.”

“It certainly feels like change is in the air.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New Mexico megachurch endorses Republican candidates, testing federal ban

Legacy Church’s endorsements violate law banning tax-exempt non-profits from endorsing political candidates

By Cecilia Nowell for The Guardian

October 29, 2026

A megachurch in New Mexico has endorsed two Republican candidates running in this year’s midterms, including a Donald Trump-backed candidate running in one of the blue state’s few competitive races. The church’s endorsements, which violate federal law banning tax-exempt non-profits from endorsing political candidates, come as the Trump administration is challenging that ban in federal court.

In mid-August, pastor Steve Smothermon of Legacy church, a nondenominational church with nine locations across the state, told his congregation about one of the candidates: “Greg Cunningham has faithfully served our church for 14 years and shares our biblical values. Let’s pray for him, support his campaign, get registered, and vote to flip this seat for someone who will stand for God, our Constitution, and a better New Mexico!”

Greg Cunningham, a Republican, is currently running to unseat the Democratic representative Gabriel Vasquez. Recent polling shows Vasquez receiving 48% of the vote to Cunningham’s 44%. In 2024, Vasquez was one of 13 Democrats across the country who won his House race in a district that voted for Donald Trump.

In hopes of maintaining their narrow majorities, Republican congressional leaders have traveled to New Mexico to campaign for Cunningham. The House speaker, Mike Johnson, has stumped for Cunningham twice, and Senate majority leader, Steve Scalise, campaigned in southern New Mexico in late October. Trump endorsed Cunningham, the only candidate from New Mexico he has weighed in on, in a Truth Social post in April.

Two months after endorsing Cunningham, Smothermon also endorsed Gregg Hull, the Republican candidate for governor. In a 6 October social media post, Smothermon wrote, “Gregg Hull should be the next governor of New Mexico,” and encouraged his followers to “Stand up and vote your biblical worldview.”

Smothermon has drawn criticism for years for endorsing candidates in state and local elections. His disputes with local politicians have made headlines since at least 2011, and in 2014 the church gave parishioners sample ballots with the names of the candidates it supported highlighted. In 2021, Smothermon told parishioners who to vote for in a city council race, and in 2022, he told members of his church to vote for the Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Ronchetti, calling the current Democratic governor “demonic”. The Freedom from Religion Foundation, a non-profit focused on the separation of church and state, later filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over Legacy’s involvement in the 2022 election.

That year, Legacy church made headlines when Smothermon told his congregation that Ronchetti had confided in him that, if elected, he would ban abortion in the state. After the 2022 election, it emerged that Solomon Peña, a state house candidate who hired hitmen to fire at the homes of several New Mexico Democratic leaders after he lost his race, had attended Legacy church.

“For the last 2.5 centuries, resisting censorship has been a cornerstone of our republic, so we knew laws curtailing it were unconstitutional and therefore null and void – especially for political speech,” Smothermon said in a statement to the Guardian. “Add to that a government manufactured health crisis as an excuse to shutter Churches and other institutions that rival or limit a pervasive overlord state and we realized very quickly that silence in the face of such tyranny was not an option. Further, in stark contrast to most government programs, we do social work that actually works rather than enabling social ills, so we earn every bit of our tax status.”

Legacy has been tied to several other scandals in the state. In 2020, Smothermon’s nephew was sentenced to 45-years in prison for abducting two men, mutilating and dismembering one of them, after he believed they stole money and drugs from his home. And in 2024, a patient of a residential drug treatment facility that the church operated sued the facility for sexual abuse. The facility and Legacy church both deny the claims, saying the lawsuit was “riddled with spurious allegations”.

The church has otherwise made headlines for protesting against same-sex marriage, school bathroom policies and Covid-19 precautions. It hosted Charlie Kirk for one of his last public appearances in August 2025.

“I very literally would not be here if not for Charlie. He visited my church and he inspired me to take a stand and answer a call to serve on this new battlefield,” Cunningham said during a speech at the Republican national convention in September. Cunningham saw Kirk speak at Legacy church, which he called “a home away from home” in a campaign video.

The Trump administration has tried to challenge the law banning churches from endorsing political candidates, although doing so remains illegal. In 2017, during his first term in office, Trump promised to “totally destroy” the Johnson amendment, the 1954 law barring tax-exempt non-profits such as churches from making political endorsements. That year, he signed an executive order limiting the treasury department’s enforcement of the law.

After he was re-elected in 2024, Trump resumed efforts to chip away at the Johnson amendment. In 2025, the Internal Revenue Service issued a court filing saying churches could endorse political candidates to their congregations. Although a court blocked the IRS’s proposal, Trump’s justice department appealed the ruling in September.

Religious institutions, particularly evangelical churches, are increasingly testing the limits of federal laws barring electioneering. According to a recent analysis from researchers at the University of Notre Dame, Dartmouth and the University of Pennsylvania, 14.7% of churches engaged in direct political advocacy and endorsements during the three months surrounding the 2024 election.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

U.S. Warns Gulf of Possible Short, Intense Renewal of Iran War After Midterms

There are signs that American, Israeli militaries preparing potential strikes to muscle Tehran to negotiating table

By Summer Said, Shelby Holliday, Benoit Faucon and Anat Peled for the Wall Street Journal

October 28, 2026

DUBAI—The U.S. has told several Gulf Arab countries to be prepared for a short, intense military campaign after the U.S. midterm elections, people briefed on the conversations said.

The communications through diplomatic and military channels are among a growing number of indications that the U.S. and Israel are readying to launch a new round of heavy combat operations against Iran, risking a major escalation in hopes of degrading Tehran’s strength and pushing it toward negotiations.

The U.S. military is sending an additional Patriot system to Israel from Texas to beef up its missile defenses in the country, according to flight-tracking data and two officials with knowledge of the movement. The U.S. has also moved troops off bases in the Middle East where they were vulnerable in preparation for an escalation, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

U.S. forces in the region have been restocking their munitions, and bomber aircraft and jet fighters are preparing for strikes, some of the officials said. An additional aircraft-carrier strike group and Marine expeditionary unit are also poised to join an armada of roughly 20 other warships operating in the Middle East next month, although some ships could rotate out.

The war, in its eighth month, is estimated to have cost $47.1 billion as of mid-October, a tally that doesn’t include damage done to U.S. bases in the region.

About 60% of the cost—$29 billion—is attributed to the expenditure of munitions such as Tomahawk and Patriot missiles, according to estimates shared with lawmakers.

President Trump hasn’t decided to go ahead but is leaning toward a large postelection attack that could target Iranian infrastructure and nuclear sites, people familiar with his thinking said.

The alternative would be to try to cut a deal. Diplomatic efforts by regional mediators continued but had yet to bear fruit.

“We may do another little Epic Fury,” Trump said at a rally last week, referring to the heavy U.S. and Israeli bombing campaign in the spring. “Or they’ll agree.”

The White House said it wouldn’t comment on “sensitive military plans that may or may not exist.”

“President Trump keeps all options on the table to ensure that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” the White House said.

The president has said he won’t attack Iran before the midterms.

The moves and related planning are meant to give Trump options should he decide to carry out a strike, people familiar with the planning said. The Defense Department said its job is to deliver such options.

Israel also has prepared plans and targets for a new attack, the Journal has reported. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has continued to push for a resumption of strikes in hopes of degrading Iran’s strength and ultimately toppling the regime.

A return to airstrikes would mean a pivot from the Trump administration’s economic pressure campaign. Tighter sanctions coupled with a naval blockade have cut off Iran’s oil sales for months, shut down much of its air links and cut into overland trade, tightening the squeeze on the country’s already spiraling economy.

“If there is a need to target a growing threat like missile reconstitution, President Trump should make that case publicly and with as much detail as possible,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a U.S. think tank. “⁠Otherwise, at the moment, the U.S. has a winning hand through maintaining sanctions and the blockade. It should stay the course.”

Many analysts believe Iran isn’t likely to capitulate under further attacks. Iran weathered more than 20,000 strikes by the U.S. and Israel during the most active phase of the war. It nevertheless has continued to attack ships in the Persian Gulf, target U.S. troops and warships, and bring tough demands to the negotiating table.

“I believe one of the biggest mistakes Israel and the United States continue to make is assuming that another round of strikes against Iran, including attacks on critical infrastructure or the elimination of senior officials, could somehow bring down the regime,” said Danny Citrinowicz, a former Israeli military intelligence official.

Further bombing could cause the regime to further dig in and become more committed to its missile and nuclear programs, he said.

The U.S. and Israel destroyed much of Iran’s nuclear program in the shorter conflict of June 2025.

Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday that his agency hasn’t identified any activity to repair or reconstruct any of the facilities damaged by attacks in either of the two wars.

But he said his inspectors haven’t had access to the facilities to check and said the IAEA hasn’t been able to verify that Iran hasn’t diverted nuclear material. The U.S. has pushed Iran to allow inspectors to return, but it has resisted.

One of the remaining sites that has raised concern—Pickaxe Mountain—sits under hundreds of feet of rock.

Trump could use a fresh round of strikes to declare victory and then reduce America’s involvement in the war, even if those strikes don’t deliver a decisive blow, said Seth Jones, a defense and security analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“I don’t think anything is going to permanently set back their program,” Jones said of Iran’s nuclear work, but strikes would allow Trump to “start to walk away and say that you had again set back Iran’s nuclear program this time.”

Iran has warned through public and private channels that it would respond to any attack with harsh strikes on economic and civilian targets across the region. It made similar threats ahead of the war, then hit U.S. bases and diplomatic facilities as well as energy facilities and airports across the Gulf.

Any Iranian retaliation this time would come as the U.S. and its Gulf allies are scrambling to restock supplies of missile defenses strained by waves of Iranian attacks so far in the war.

Despite the damage done by the U.S. and Israel, Iran retains a stockpile of hundreds to thousands of missiles and has used the lull in fighting to shore up its defenses and prepare new plans for retaliation.

The country is assembling new ballistic missiles from stockpiled parts. Israeli officials are concerned by the speed with which Iran has been rebuilding.

Middle East mediators are trying to revive talks with Iran to head off a new wave of combat. So far, they have had little luck, with the U.S. insisting on discussing Iran’s nuclear program and Tehran laying out tough demands for resuming talks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

He Helped Deport 200 People. Now He Has Misgivings.

A deputy in small-town Texas became the local face of ICE’s national crackdown.

By Francesca D’Annunzio and McKenzie Funk for The New York Times Magazone.

The reporters spoke with more than 100 people in Texas and Mexico over seven months and reviewed thousands of pages of public records.

October 25, 2026

The new patrol officer parked his black Dodge Charger outside a house off Main Street and approached on foot. A Mexican ballad was playing. Someone had called in a noise complaint, claiming it sounded as if people were fighting.

But as the officer, Jaron Alexander, got closer, he found nothing of the sort. A middle-aged woman greeted him as her daughter, Joanna Martinez, petite and visibly pregnant, looked on. “What kind of party are you all having?” she remembers him asking. Behind her were three generations of an extended family. They were celebrating a 3-month-old’s baptism over pozole verde, horchata and beers.

Alexander ran some IDs and found no issues. The music wasn’t even that loud, he thought. He told them to have a good night, and then he left.

That encounter, in early October last year, was the first of many that Alexander and Martinez would have in tiny Ingram, Texas, a 1.5-square-mile town of 1,900 people beside the Guadalupe River. But it was the only one before Ingram signed an agreement with United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement that would roil the town and tear Martinez’s family apart.

“Her and I, at the beginning, I felt like we were running into each other all the time,” Alexander told us, in one of eight conversations over four months that offer a rare window into the thoughts of one of the local police officers on the front lines of the Trump administration’s deportation campaign.

In a town as small as Ingram, drivable in five minutes end to end, more run-ins were probably inevitable. Later that October, Alexander pulled over a work truck for rolling through a stop sign, and soon there Martinez was, demanding that he let her friends go rather than let immigration take them. He didn’t. He pulled over another driver in November who turned out to be her cousin, the father of the baby they celebrated at the baptism party. Alexander handed him over to immigration agents as well.

He pulled over Martinez herself a few weeks before she was due to give birth, she says, surprising her when he knew her name and the type of car she typically drove. He warned her that the car’s window tint was illegal and let her go. After that, he says, he caught a glimpse of her and her husband and their newborn daughter in the toy aisle at Walmart. Martinez told us she doesn’t think it was even her that day — her baby girl was then just days old, and she couldn’t imagine running errands with her so soon. But in Alexander’s memory, she was shopping for Christmas presents, just like him.

Alexander, who is in his mid-30s, with dirty blond hair already turning gray, says he didn’t come back to Ingram to help deport his neighbors. In his telling, he just ended up making it part of his job. The town was where he started his law-enforcement career years earlier, before he took a better-paying position with the county, as a sheriff’s deputy. But things recently started to fall apart, first in his marriage, next at the sheriff’s office: A 185-page internal investigation found that he had an affair before his divorce was final and used a county vehicle to carry it out, then lied about it all. He says the investigator called him an “embarrassment to the profession.” The sheriff’s office fired him. (Alexander said at the time, and again to us, that he did not have the affair.)

Ingram’s Police Department took him back just when its new chief — its eighth in five years — was under pressure from the City Council to do more: more traffic stops, more citations, more arrests, more numbers. Alexander says he told the chief that the sheriff’s office had a deal with ICE and that Ingram should look into it; maybe it could help the department grow. “Blame me,” he eventually told people. “It’s my fault in a way.”

Donald Trump had retaken the presidency with a promise to carry out “the largest deportation in the history of our country.” America was still figuring out what that meant. Finding and expelling up to 4 percent of the U.S. population — the 14 million residents who are estimated to be undocumented — wasn’t something a few thousand ICE agents could do on their own.

Underway in Chicago that fall, and soon in Minneapolis, was one version of how the administration could try to do it: masked agents from across the federal government surging into a liberal city to round up immigrants, beating back — even killing — the citizens who tried to stand in their path.

But a quieter kind of surge was spreading across the country at the same time. In September 2025, ICE announced new incentives for a partnership program known as 287(g). The program’s most aggressive form, the so-called task force model, which Ingram opted in to, enlists local police officers as deputy immigration agents, and the new incentives included a $100,000 vehicle stipend, a $7,500 equipment stipend for every participating officer, quarterly performance bonuses and funding to help cover officer salaries and overtime. “By joining forces with ICE,” the announcement read, “you’re not just gaining access to these unprecedented reimbursement opportunities — you’re becoming part of a national effort to ensure the safety of every American family.”

Alexander completed an online course with ICE a few weeks after the baptism party, qualifying him for time-and-a-half pay whenever he helped the agency pick up immigrants. Here in the Texas Hill Country, he soon became the local face of the national crackdown.

Ingram was just starting to recover from its worst natural disaster in a century, the flood that summer that killed at least 139 people up and down the Guadalupe River, including 25 girls at Camp Mystic. In the riverbed, towering bald cypress trees now stood at a lean, their branches swept back by a 30-foot surge of water and mud, their trunks still plastered with debris. As construction workers rebuilding the community traveled to their job sites via Junction Highway, Ingram’s five-lane main thoroughfare, a black Charger began stopping them before they could get there.

Within three months of the baptism party, Alexander and Ingram’s other patrol officer had delivered at least 70 people to immigration agents, picking off what the police chief called a “dumbfounding” number of undocumented drivers. Within a year, they would hand over the equivalent of 10 percent of Ingram to ICE.

The weight of what Alexander was doing started to settle on him after Christmas. He says he was out patrolling as one of his new ICE handlers, a man in a ball cap and dark glasses, hovered nearby in an unmarked S.U.V. Around lunchtime, Alexander followed two Latino men in a 2008 GMC truck for several blocks before stopping them, they recall him saying, for failing to signal a turn.

A young man sat in the passenger seat. Alexander checked his papers along with the driver’s and determined that both were undocumented. The agent in the unmarked S.U.V. rolled up behind them. Alexander realized who the man in the passenger seat was only after Martinez arrived in tears. It was her husband, Ulices Macias, the father of her newborn daughter.

“I don’t normally do this,” Martinez recalls Alexander telling her, “but I’m going to open up the car. I’m going to take the handcuffs off him.” He let the family have a moment together. In a video taken by Martinez’s younger sister, Alexander stood by, expressionless, as Martinez embraced Macias by the rear door of the Charger. He watched Macias cradle his 2-week-old baby girl, swaddled in a white blanket, and hug Martinez’s 4-year-old son, his stepson.

Then the ICE agent put the handcuffs back on Martinez’s husband, wrapped a chain around his waist and led him away. Alexander says Martinez threw herself to the ground and sobbed.

Images of the family he broke up shortly after Christmas would intrude on Alexander’s thoughts for months, he told us. But it didn’t keep him from doing his job. His next shift came a few days after he handed over Macias, and he was back in the Charger, back to stopping cars on Junction Highway.

‘Mini Guanajuato’

Alexander says he didn’t always want to be a police officer. He describes himself as “kind of a chameleon.” He grew up in nearby Harper, tried a few different colleges without graduating and spent his 20s cycling though jobs in freight logistics, pest control and insurance.

Still seeking his calling, he arranged a ride-along with a police officer outside Austin. What sold him on policing was the suburban officer’s power to enforce the law as he saw fit. That day, they pulled over a woman who had a warrant out for her arrest. She was coming back from the store with children and groceries in the back seat.

“You can use your discretion,” Alexander recalls the officer telling him. Wouldn’t they be doing more harm if they took her? What would the kids do without their mother? And wouldn’t it all create more paperwork? The officer let her go. Alexander imagined himself making the same kinds of judgment calls. In 2021, he enrolled in the police academy.

Even before the floods, tensions were rising in Ingram. Hundreds of Mexican immigrants and their families had settled there in recent decades as an increasingly militarized border made it harder for seasonal ranch hands and other workers to cross back and forth. Latinos would come to make up 45 percent of its population, and some residents began affectionately calling Ingram “mini Guanajuato,” after the central Mexican state where many have roots. Yet when Alexander returned, Ingram’s City Council still consisted of six white men.

A council faction led by Claud Jordan, now the town’s mayor, and Rocky Hawkins, now the mayor pro tem, came to power in November 2020, in a revolt against a new sewer project. They abolished Ingram’s city administrator position and took direct control of the Police Department, cycling through chief after chief. Five former city employees say Hawkins regularly used racist slurs for Mexicans. Four say that he pressured the city to go after Latinos through code enforcement or targeted patrols, and two say that Jordan did, too. One of the employees recalls Hawkins complaining that Mexicans were “taking over Ingram.” (Hawkins and Jordan each declined to speak on the record or address detailed questions we sent them by email. In a brief text-message exchange, Hawkins said that none of it was right but declined to offer any specific concerns.)

These were the men the new chief, Dustin Breshears, had to answer to as ICE revived the task force program, which had been shut down for a dozen years until the day Trump returned to office in January 2025. ICE, under President Barack Obama, had phased out the program after some of the first sheriffs to participate in it, including Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., used it to disproportionately target Latinos in their communities. Investigations by the Department of Justice found that deputies in the task force program pulled over Latino drivers at up to nine times the rate of other drivers and that some retaliated violently against people who accused them of racial profiling. But now, under Trump, any law-enforcement agency, no matter how troubled or small, was encouraged to sign up.

Breshears began appearing at City Council meetings armed with statistics: number of arrests since the last meeting, number of traffic stops, number of cleared cases from the backlog of hundreds he inherited — and number of what he called “deportations.” (He later explained this was his imprecise shorthand for “immigration-related enforcement activities.”) At the council’s October 2025 meeting, held a couple of weeks after Alexander showed up at the Martinez family’s baptism party, Breshears reported a remarkable 162 traffic stops by Ingram’s two patrol officers — Alexander and Christian Perez, who was 25 — in just 20 days. (Perez declined to comment.) The officers made more stops in two months than the department had made in the entire previous year. The City Council gave Breshears an $18,000 raise.

Before Breshears arrived and Alexander returned in August 2025, the weekly blotter in The West Kerr Current, the local newspaper, documented the humdrum of community policing: loose dogs, neighborhood disputes, code violations. Then, suddenly, it was filled with drivers stopped for defective brake lights, damaged license plates, cracked windshields, illegal window tints or other unspecified “equipment violations.”

Breshears and Alexander strongly deny targeting Latinos. “It’s honestly not what’s happening,” Breshears says, noting that his half brother, wife and daughters have Mexican heritage. Ingram’s traffic stops were simply up across the board, he says, so more Latinos were getting stopped. He shared statistics showing that stops of Latinos were proportional to their share of the population.

Alexander, who on top of his roughly $70,000 base salary was now logging dozens of hours per month for ICE, told us the same. “I don’t care who’s in the car,” he says. “I really don’t.”

‘El Charger Negro’

As the ICE program took hold in Ingram, warnings about Alexander and his black Charger — the department has several — spread through the Hill Country and far beyond. Groups on Facebook and WhatsApp seemed to track his every move. The Charger was outside Rita’s taco shop. The Charger was near Dollar General. The Charger was parked by the church. A member of one particularly active Facebook group texted him screenshots, and he scrolled through blurry photos of himself looming behind work trucks or leaning over car windows.

Many Latino motorists trying to reach work sites up the Guadalupe began driving an extra 90 minutes each day to avoid the section of Junction Highway that Alexander patrolled. Ranch hands began sleeping at their employers’ properties in nearby Hunt, coming to town only when they knew — or hoped — that Ingram’s officers would be off duty. Residents were rattled the day a Customs and Border Protection helicopter hovered above town and the elementary school went into lockdown as the police hunted for a Mexican man who had run from one of Alexander’s traffic stops.

One family notarized guardianship papers, in case the parents were detained and the children left behind. One woman swore Alexander showed up outside a memorial service and asked people for IDs. Another woman said he detained her and her husband when they returned home from church. Parties dwindled. Invite lists shrank. People began to move away, to Kerrville and San Antonio, and Alexander’s reputation reached as far as La Ceja, a village in the mountains of central Mexico, where an elderly resident said he and his neighbors were familiar with the Texas town’s police. “El Charger negro,” he said, with a knowing nod. He estimated that some 20 or 30 people in the village were recent deportees from Ingram.

Alexander’s fortunes seemed to rise as the Martinez family’s fell. With her husband gone, Joanna Martinez couldn’t afford payments on the trailer they shared. She and their infant and her 4-year-old son moved back into her childhood bedroom in her mother’s crowded home, where several relatives and their children also lived. She tried to stay connected with her husband, Macias, via WhatsApp calls while working as much as she could as a house cleaner to keep afloat. “I can’t lock myself up in my room and just cry,” Martinez says.

Winter for Martinez and her family brought a string of dark incidents. The January arrest of her cousin near the carwash as she drove to pick up her children from school. A canceled baby shower for her older sister, Jazmin, over a rumor that the Charger planned to show up. Another cousin, himself the father of a newborn, stopped and taken right in front of her mother’s house as Martinez watched.

A half-dozen of the attendees from the October baptism party would soon be gone from Ingram, after being detained and deported or leaving to join relatives who had been. Some people had gotten wind that Alexander was making money off his enforcement. When a Spanish-language Facebook page shared a photo of him questioning the passenger of a beige Ford pickup, someone posted an animated image in the comments: a stack of green dollar bills growing taller and taller in an endless loop.

Alexander received his first ICE payments in early December. In January, as the country’s attention turned to the violent immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, he was often spending three or four hours a day and sometimes entire shifts working on behalf of the federal agency. By the time federal authorities announced a drawdown in Minneapolis on Feb. 12, Alexander had already made $3,264.46 from his task force hours, according to his pay stubs.

Ingram was by then one of more than 750 task force model partners around the country, up from not quite 500 when it signed up in October. At least 43 million U.S. residents, according to an analysis of ICE records by the legal data firm Titus Consulting, already lived in a county with an active task force agreement. Alexander was one of thousands of deputized officers in Texas alone.

In interviews, Alexander described the immigration system he was enforcing as “skewed” and “weird,” but he saw himself as largely separate from these concerns. “If you’re taking federal money to do a job,” he says, “I think you should do the job.”

Still, he seemed to struggle with the contradictions of his role. He told us he sometimes shared his lunch with the people he detained and that he let them hold on to their phones to call loved ones from the rear seat of the Charger. He handcuffed them with their hands in the front rather than the back so they could use their hands.

Martinez told us about a moment when she watched him detain one of her cousins. He allowed the man’s wife and children to hug him goodbye and waited until his 7-year-old daughter wasn’t looking to handcuff him. To Martinez, it seemed as if Alexander was trying to prove to her that he wasn’t a bad person. “But I’m not going to fall for it,” she says.

There was a protest in Ingram the following day against President Trump’s mass deportations. Martinez decided to go. As she stood among a few dozen protesters waving a handmade sign with the name “J. Alexander” circled and crossed out, she saw him drive by again and again.

A few weeks later, Katie Winer, the leader of the group that staged the protest, was following the Charger after Alexander detained another immigrant in a traffic stop. He approached her car and threatened to arrest her if she followed him in the future, on charges of interfering with public duties. But he also seemed to want to talk, and she recorded him as they discussed what was going on in Ingram. “I think you guys are making a bigger deal of it than they are,” he said of the people he handed over to ICE. The only outliers were “loudmouths” like Martinez and “her little crew.”

Winer interjected that Martinez’s husband was the family’s breadwinner, and it was Alexander’s actions that tore them apart.

“My actions did not,” Alexander said. “His actions did. I made a traffic stop. He was here illegally. That’s not my fault.”

Still, Alexander’s uncertainty seemed to be growing. In March, another of Martinez’s cousins confronted him outside the taco shop, pressing him about Macias as she filmed with her phone.

“If I’m being 100 percent honest,” he said, “I don’t enjoy when families are separated, like with the Joanna situation. That kind of fucked me up.”

‘I Voted to Get the Bad Guys Out’

A month later, as Ingram’s handoffs to ICE surpassed 100 people, another video of Alexander circulated among a small group of community members. It showed an evening traffic stop, at least the fifth stop Alexander made that day. He had followed a silver Ford F-250 from the highway until it pulled into the gravel driveway of a mobile home. There, the man in the passenger seat, a landscaper named Victor Ramirez Hernandez, tried to hurry inside. Alexander grabbed him before he could get there.

The truck’s driver pulled out his phone and began filming. “Why are you arresting him?” he asked.

“I’m not,” Alexander answered, struggling to place handcuffs on Ramirez as he squirmed. “I’m detaining him.” Then he wrapped his hands around the laborer’s chest, lifted him off the ground and slammed him down on the driveway. “I played nice with you, and now I’m done,” he said. He straddled Ramirez and cuffed his hands behind his back.

“He’s bleeding because you hit him,” the driver said evenly. They argued back and forth.

“You’re an idiot,” Alexander said, his face reddening. “Shut up. The more you talk it’s just making you look stupider.” (Alexander declined to comment on this incident. Breshears, who reviewed body-camera footage, says Alexander’s use of force was justified to control a potentially dangerous situation.)

Acrimony pulsed through Ingram that spring. In the Latino community, family members and neighbors accused one another of snitching, which Alexander says did happen. Young women accused one another of having affairs with him, which he denies, insisting that people just misinterpreted his attempts to be kind. “I’m friendly with the people that I meet,” he says, “especially when they’re friendly to me.”

One subject of these rumors was Martinez. She and her older sister scoffed at them. “He’s taken our whole family at this point,” Jazmin says. “And she’s going to sleep with him? It’s really annoying.” But some in the community, even cousins, stopped speaking with her. “It’s like ‘Hunger Games,’” Martinez says.

As Latinos fled and avoided Ingram, the daily takeout orders at one Mexican restaurant on the edge of town dropped to 50 from 200. A corner store catering to immigrants lost around half its revenue and most of its Latino regulars. Landlords in a mobile-home park just outside town struggled to find tenants.

But it wasn’t just Ingram’s Latino community that was reeling. For Ingram’s non-Hispanic business owners, including many Republicans in a county that voted 77 percent for Trump in the 2024 election, the immigration crackdown was becoming an outrage. It was taking people they worked with and knew well. It was interfering with flood reconstruction. It was hurting the local economy.

The owner of a heavily damaged strip mall on the western edge of town, Steve Edelstein, lamented the loss of two workers who were helping him rebuild. “Technically local law enforcement is doing their job,” he told a reporter for The West Kerr Current, emphasizing that he supported Trump. “But it isn’t helping the community.” A manager overseeing the rebuilding of Ingram’s Little League field, which was washed away in the flood, made an angry call to the city after two of his workers were picked up, Breshears says. A contractor helping rebuild Hunt’s destroyed post office had his crew reduced to eight workers from 30 — causing what should have been a four-day job to stretch to two weeks.

Among the people who called Jordan, the mayor, to complain was his onetime high school classmate Neal Secor, who describes himself as “one of the most conservative guys you’ll ever meet.” His family business, a cluster of rental cabins called Waltonia on the River, was nearly destroyed by the flood. He was struggling to rebuild. He says that in the spring, in two separate stops, the Ingram police detained four of his workers and handed them over to ICE — the second set as they returned from a job repairing the docks at a nearby youth camp, a favor Secor was trying to do for a neighbor.

Secor says Jordan’s defense was simple: You voted for this. They’d all voted for this.

“Let me tell you something,” Secor says he told Jordan. “I didn’t vote for this. I voted to get the bad guys out.” The two employees detained coming back from the youth camp were like family, his friends and co-workers for over a decade. “There’s still a lot of bad guys here,” he continued. “These guys aren’t them.”

Secor recalls Jordan saying that Ingram’s officers were just following the law. But, Secor wondered, why was it that he could drive 85 every day on the 75-mile-an-hour interstate and police officers just let him pass? He told Jordan he’d put 175,000 miles on his truck and never been pulled over. “It’s a matter of what laws you want to pick and choose,” he recalls telling the mayor. “We all break laws every day if you really want to get down to it.”

‘God Wanted Me to Meet You’

On an unpaved side street in the Ingram hills in April, Alexander again faced a decision over whether to separate a young family. This time he had more of a choice; ICE had yet to arrive. A woman named Norma Luján took his hand and said she was praying for him.

Luján, 61, runs a successful housecleaning company based in Ingram. She had heard of Alexander long before she confronted him. She had seen him in the Charger, too: on the side of Junction Highway as she made her way to jobs at vacation homes or youth camps up in Hunt. On the side of the highway on the way back. In her rearview mirror for four excruciating minutes one afternoon as her “girls,” as she called her crew, held their breath and sank into their seats, protected by the tint of her car’s windows and the fact that a license-plate reader would show it was registered to her, a Texas-born U.S. citizen.

In January, at the carwash, Alexander had helped a sheriff’s deputy take one of Luján’s best employees into custody. The woman, Cinthya Carranza, was a single mother and asylum seeker from Guanajuato — and Joanna Martinez’s cousin. Carranza was on her way to get her children from school after she and Luján spent the day cleaning houses. Later that day, Luján saw a Facebook post showing a familiar face in a mug shot: Carranza’s. Luján broke into tears. To her, the arrest was a signal event. The Charger had mostly stopped men up to that point. This was the moment she understood that no one was safe.

Luján started losing workers in droves after Carranza was taken — some to traffic stops, most for fear of having to drive through Ingram. Her crew of 30 people dropped to fewer than 10. She worried for her business, but she worried more, she said, for her workers, the lives they had made in Ingram and the relationships she had built with them. They invited her to parties and baptisms, surprised her with presents on her birthday. She often led them in prayer. “I love them,” she says. She promised she would try to protect them.

When Luján’s employee Maria called that April afternoon to say the officer in the Charger was outside her house, detaining her husband as he returned from work, Luján jumped into action. Maria (who asked to be identified by her middle name because she is undocumented) was eight months pregnant and already terrified that she would have to give birth alone. Alexander had taken her brother a week earlier. Now Maria was hiding behind the curtains of her home, sneaking peeks outside, hoping Alexander would let her husband go.

“Cálmate” — calm down — Luján told herself as she approached the Charger. “Cálmate.” She took a deep breath. She says Alexander was sitting in the driver’s seat with the door propped open, staring at a tablet computer.

“Look, his wife has had a complicated pregnancy,” she told him. (This was true.) “She’s in the hospital.” (For that lie, Luján says, she later prayed for forgiveness.)

Then Luján reached out and grabbed Alexander’s hand. “I pray for your being, for your soul,” she recalls telling him as she cried. “I want you to think about what you’re doing. Feel it. Feel it, please.” She squeezed his hand. “I need you to look inside your heart,” she continued, “and let him go.”

Alexander didn’t react at first, in Luján’s telling. “God wanted me to meet you,” she said. He met her gaze.

“I’m that guy that everyone talks about on Facebook,” she recalls him finally saying. “If you think I don’t lose any sleep, you’re wrong.”

Luján pushed through the lump in her throat to speak. “I’m going to pray for you every night,” she promised him. She says Alexander squeezed her hand back, then pulled away. He walked off to make a call. She couldn’t make out much of what he said. It was quiet, save for the sound of Luján’s sobs and the pebbles from the unpaved road crunching beneath the officer’s feet.

Then he returned to the Charger. “Get him out of the car,” Luján recalls him saying. “Hurry up.”

“God bless you,” Luján said. “God will repay you for this.”

Alexander says he doesn’t remember the details of his interaction with Luján, but he confirms that he let Maria’s husband go, calling it a matter of “human decency.” He knew how hard it was to raise children. “A woman needs rest,” he says. “She needs help.” Maria’s husband “needs to be there helping out.”

At first, nothing seemed to change. Over the next two months, as the Hill Country prepared to welcome summer tourists and campers back after the devastation of the floods, Alexander worked around 100 task force hours, earning close to $5,000 from ICE.

But the next time he ran into Joanna Martinez, he seemed to be having misgivings. It was early June, and he was eight months into the ICE program. He had pulled over another of her family friends on Junction Highway, a person she had known since childhood. Martinez got a phone call and rushed to the scene, as she had so many times before. “I don’t feel good about this,” she recalls him saying when she arrived. “I signed up to be a cop, not an ICE agent.” (Alexander says he remembers that they talked and that he could have said something like that.)

Later that month, he pulled over a young man from Honduras who was on his way to a soccer game with his cousin, a 12-year-old with developmental disabilities. The boy’s father says he and his wife hid across the street watching it all happen, too terrified to step out and claim their son. The parents sent a friend from church, but she was not a legal guardian. Alexander says he had no choice but to hand the boy over to ICE, adding though that if he was one of the parents, he would see it differently. “If I’m in that position, there’s no way I’m letting my kid go,” he told us. “I’m probably fighting someone.”

Within a couple of weeks, Alexander’s task force hours dropped by about 40 percent, according to his pay stubs. It remains unclear if he tried to step back from immigration work or whether the number of undocumented drivers in Ingram had simply dwindled because of all he had already done.

According to Chief Breshears, Ingram had logged 194 “immigration-related incidents” as of this August. Whether every handover led to a deportation, Breshears couldn’t say. Alexander says he doesn’t know how many of the 194 are people he stopped. But he says he has now let at least 10 people go — many, though not all of them, mothers of young children.

Alexander sees this, and his relationship to the Martinez family, as evidence of his humanity, despite what people say about him. “For context, I’ve deported like six of their family members, and they’re still friendly to me,” he says. “So I’m not the monster they make me out to be.”

On July 16, the skies over Ingram opened again, dropping nearly 19 inches of rain in a single day, and the Guadalupe again overtopped its banks, again destroying businesses and homes. In the predawn darkness in the early hours of the emergency, Alexander began racing toward Ingram in his black Charger to help. He had barely left his house when surging floodwaters consumed the vehicle, destroying the Charger’s engine block. A driver in a pickup truck took him back home, and that’s where he stayed until the storm receded.

‘One Free Pass’

Alexander remains only one cog in a deportation machine for which the federal government has now earmarked $240 billion. Today more than 1,900 agencies in at least 30 states have signed up for ICE’s task force model, with more than 29,000 deputized officers. With their help, ICE recently hit a record of immigration arrests, totaling more than 50,000 in August.

On Sept. 11, Alexander met one of us at a taco spot on Junction Highway. Ingram had changed in the year since his return. Whole neighborhoods had emptied out, and residents noticed fewer drivers on the streets. In part because of the money from ICE, the Police Department had hired two additional officers. As a Mexican ballad played over the speakers, Alexander warned against making too much of the leniency he showed to families like Maria’s. “It’s like one free pass, I guess,” he said: If he encountered her husband again during a traffic stop, he would probably hand him over to ICE. He just thought letting the father-to-be go was the right call at the time. “I mean, don’t you?” he asked.

He said he hadn’t made all that much money working with ICE. But city records show that his earnings from the agency already totaled $18,793.25 in nine months, more than a quarter of his base salary. “I think it’s skewed a little bit,” he said, looking at the pay stubs we had gathered.

Alexander said it was hard for him to be out in public anymore. He can’t escape being recognized in Ingram and Kerrville. Sometimes he catches Latinos staring at him, then walking away, visibly uncomfortable. So he tries to do his shopping and errands in another town 30 minutes away.

He blamed the Facebook groups. They had created a climate of “unreasonable fear” in Ingram. “What do they think I’m going to do right now?” he asked, seated at his table in the taco shop. A steady stream of customers, many of them white, approached a counter staffed by two young Mexican sisters. He said their father used to hide out in Hunt to avoid being pulled over in town. Some of their co-workers had quit months before, too uncomfortable to serve Alexander when he came in for breakfast. But when the taco shop owner sees him, he said, she hugs him.

“I know the status of everybody in this room,” he said. He suggested everyone who worked there was undocumented. Whether they disappeared or were allowed to stay was up to him. And today, at least, he was just there for breakfast.

“They’re fine, right?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In U.S. Gas Talks With Kremlin, Hidden Financing for Alaska Project Emerges

Interviews and documents show a Russian energy giant secretly funded a U.S. firm. The deal has been discussed in talks to end the war in Ukraine.

By Anton Troianovski and Eric Lipton for The New York Times

October 23, 2026

At first blush, the proposed venture looks like it would further the Trump administration’s goal of global “energy dominance.”

An American energy company intends to buy Russian technology and use it to access a massive supply of natural gas in Alaska, liquefy it and export it to allies abroad.

The Kremlin and the White House were interested in the idea. President Vladimir V. Putin discussed the plan last month with President Trump’s peace envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, people familiar with the negotiations said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. It is one of a series of energy deals White House officials believe could help smooth relations with Moscow and eventually pave the way to end the war in Ukraine.

But it turns out that the company was not an all-American affair. The multibillion-dollar project has received secret funding from the same powerful Russian company that was to provide the technology, according to the energy executive who until last month led the U.S. firm and two others involved in company negotiations.

Joel Riddle, who was chief executive of the company, Polar LNG, until he resigned in September, said he had been misled about the sources of the start-up funding, which ostensibly came from a company in the United Arab Emirates.

Instead, Mr. Riddle said he learned, the true source of at least some of Polar LNG’s money was Novatek, a Russian energy giant under partial U.S. sanctions.

“It’s not only unlawful, but it’s not in the U.S. interest to have Russian technology controlling the commercialization of Arctic gas in the North Slope,” Mr. Riddle said in a brief interview.

These previously unreported tensions were also detailed in legal memos that Mr. Riddle attached to his resignation letter, which was reviewed by The New York Times. The memos, prepared by Baker Botts, an international law firm, said the Treasury Department’s sanctions enforcement unit had raised concerns that Polar LNG had ties to Novatek that might present “potential Russia-related sanctions concerns.”

Polar LNG on Friday issued a statement announcing a new acting chief executive, Tim Talkington, and described Mr. Riddle as a “disgruntled former employee.”

But in a statement to The Times, Novatek said on Friday that in fact, it was moving to acquire “minority shareholder” status in the Polar LNG project — a striking effort by the Russian energy giant to seek ownership of American gas production.

The project, if it happens, is a long way off. In addition to the sanctions issues that would have to be negotiated, the technology envisioned is highly complex and must overcome some of the most brutal weather conditions in the United States. It also is competing with another Alaska gas plan that already has the support of the Trump administration. But that the Polar LNG deal is being discussed at all shows how business deals of almost any stripe are on the table during the talks with the Kremlin.

The sequence of events illustrates the unorthodox, opaque mixture of deal-making and high-stakes diplomacy that has defined Mr. Trump’s attempts to end Europe’s bloodiest conflict since World War II.

There is no indication that Mr. Witkoff and Mr. Kushner were aware of Polar LNG or its ties to Novatek, even as the broad outlines of the deal came up in their talks with Mr. Putin beginning last year. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door talks, said that the deal had only been broadly mentioned and that no granular discussions had occurred.

The project, should it ever come to fruition, would doubly help Novatek, one of Russia’s biggest energy companies, first by using Novatek’s technology and second because the company would own an equity stake.

The Alaska gas discussions have taken place alongside talks to sell off part of another Russian energy giant, Lukoil, to the U.S. government and other investors, including some with business ties to Mr. Witkoff and Mr. Kushner, causing consternation among some Washington lawmakers and outraging some of Ukraine’s supporters. The pair have also discussed the possibility of U.S. involvement in future Russian gas exports to Europe. (The administration has said that Mr. Kushner and Mr. Witkoff were guided only by U.S. interests.)

Geoffrey R. Pyatt, who served as an assistant secretary of state for energy resources during the Biden administration, said the idea of bringing Novatek into the high north of Alaska is a terrible one. “It is terrible on environmental grounds, it is a terrible idea on economic and geopolitical grounds, and most importantly this feeds the belief that Putin can get an out-of-jail-free card.”

The efforts to bring Novatek equipment to Alaska have also included a businessman, Gentry Beach, with ties to the Trump family. A college friend of Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, Mr. Beach served as a finance vice chairman for Mr. Trump’s 2017 inauguration. Mr. Beach said in February that he had held negotiations with Novatek about bringing its natural gas technology to Alaska.

Mr. Beach could not be reached for comment. It was not clear if he remained involved in the project, or whether he was aware of Novatek’s potential ownership stake in Polar LNG.

A spokesman for Donald Trump Jr. said the two men were no longer close, adding that Mr. Trump was not involved in the Polar LNG project. Novatek’s statement said that Mr. Beach had no role in its discussions to take a stake in Polar LNG. The U.S. official said Mr. Beach was not involved in the administration’s discussions related to Novatek.

Mr. Riddle is one of at least three Polar LNG executives who recently resigned. As they departed, Trump officials were notified about their concerns related to the secret Russian financing. Mr. Riddle said the executives had urged administration officials to investigate the matter. The Energy Department, where the warning was sent, did not respond when asked about the matter.

“I felt like I did the right thing to notify authorities at the appropriate time,” Mr. Riddle said.

Buried Riches

The Polar LNG plan called for the company to tap into the giant load of natural gas available in the northern reaches of Alaska, a byproduct of extensive oil extraction underway in the region.

Currently, there is no way to move most of the gas that is produced along with the oil, so energy companies inject it back into the earth.

Polar LNG’s proposal calls for it to buy a giant, 640,000-ton concrete-and-steel device from Novatek called a gravity-based structure that would be placed on the seabed just above the northern coast of Alaska, in an area known as Milne Point.

On top of that platform, equipment will be installed that would refrigerate gas supplied by an area oil producer, transforming it into a liquid that can then be loaded onto ships that travel through icy waters and deliver it to customers in Asia.

Novatek uses a similar approach to export natural gas from the Russian Arctic in a project called Arctic LNG 2. Mr. Putin said publicly last year that “we are discussing with our American partners” the possibility of using Novatek technology to produce liquefied natural gas in Alaska.

Korean-made ships with a special ice-breaking design that Polar LNG plans to use were initially built for Novatek, but delivery was stopped by the manufacturer after the United States imposed sanctions on the Arctic LNG 2 project.

From the start, Novatek was slated to supply the gas liquefaction station. But financing for the project was not supposed to come from Russia, according to executives involved in the effort.

Emphasizing the point, Polar LNG features images of the American flag and a bald eagle on its website, boasting that “Polar LNG helps ensure the United States leads,” adding that the project is “America’s Arctic Advantage.”

The company hired lobbyists in Washington and in Alaska to help push the project, according to federal and state records. In Washington alone, the company is spending $380,000 a quarter on lobbying, hiring a former Trump-era Interior Department acting assistant secretary, Adam Suess.

Novatek is already under U.S. sanctions that would require the Treasury Department to issue a license for its equipment to be used in Alaska. Recently passed sanctions legislation named after deceased Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, makes things even harder: The bill specifically targets Novatek, as well as its Arctic LNG 2 project, because of the company’s ties to Mr. Putin.

However, Mr. Trump temporarily waived the law’s Russia sanctions last week, presenting the move as necessary to keep peace talks going.

During a meeting held at the Four Seasons Hotel in late August in Abu Dhabi between executives of Polar LNG and its parent company, Tech Wave Industrial Projects Management, top executives from Novatek were present. That was when Mr. Riddle began to appreciate that Novatek was directly involved in approving funding to keep the effort going, text messages reviewed by The Times indicate.

Tech Wave is an Abu Dhabi-based company that specializes in managing oil, gas and construction projects. Its chief operating officer is Bjorn Gundersen, who a decade ago was listed in oil industry trade publications as a senior executive at Novatek supervising LNG projects.

A second Tech Wave executive, Ahmed Farghaly, also worked for Novatek until recently. According to his LinkedIn profile, he left around the time the United States first imposed sanctions on one of Novatek’s LNG projects.

Tech Wave, in a statement, confirmed that Mr. Gundersen had worked for Novatek before 2022, the year the war with Ukraine started. It also said Novatek “has no ownership interest” in the company. The statement did not address questions from The Times as to whether Novatek money helped finance the Polar LNG efforts.

Denis Solovyov, Novatek’s deputy chairman, and Leonid Mikhelson, the company’s chief executive, discussed their company’s providing as much as $15 million to Tech Wave to bankroll Polar LNG, the messages say. Asked about the messages and the Abu Dhabi meeting, Novatek said it could not comment on private correspondence, but that the company and Polar LNG had agreed to “provide each other with open communication.”

“All the necessary decisions were made at the meeting in Abu Dhabi,” Mr. Solovyov wrote in one message to Mr. Riddle sent in early September. “The first 5 million were supposed to arrive by today.”

It was several weeks after this exchange that Mr. Riddle resigned. Two other top Polar LNG executives, Dan Chandra, the company’s chief financial officer, and Jim Smith, a former Exxon Mobil executive who served as Polar LNG’s executive vice president, also have left in recent weeks.

Polar LNG, in a statement Friday, said that “Riddle was recently terminated from the company for cause,” adding: “The company is investigating claims concerning Riddle that may result in litigation.”

But Mr. Riddle resigned six days before the company issued him a letter saying it would terminate his employment immediately, in part because he had raised concerns that some of the company’s actions could be “subject to sanctions,” documents obtained by The Times show.

Questions about the potential ties to Novatek had by late this summer already reached Trump administration officials, according to a memo prepared by an outside law firm for Polar LNG, Baker Botts.

“Concerns regarding a perceived connection to Novatek will likely affect licensing or other regulatory approvals,” Baker Botts wrote in a memo to company executives that was shared with The Times.

In addition, the letter said that federal officials had already made clear in communications with the company that they were concerned that an investor in Polar LNG “has ties to Novatek and may be acting on Novatek’s behalf with respect to the project.”

Paul Luther, a Baker Botts lawyer who worked on the matter, declined on Friday to discuss it further.

Polar LNG would need a series of approvals from the federal government before the deal could move ahead, including a sign-off from the Treasury Department authorizing it to acquire the Novatek seabed platform, given that parts of the company are under sanctions. It would also require a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to build a gas export facility.

Questions have already emerged about whether the Novatek device will function at the planned Milne Point location because of shallow waters there and the “potential disruption to traditional whaling and local opposition, particularly from the local native Alaskan population,” a lawyer for Polar LNG wrote in an internal company memo.

Certain Trump administration officials had already expressed skepticism about the Polar LNG plan, according to internal company documents seen by The Times and interviews with some of the people involved.

Part of the concern is that the Polar LNG project would be pitted against an even more ambitious plan to build a $50 billion, 800-mile natural gas pipeline to move natural gas from the northern slope to the southern coast of Alaska, where it could be more easily shipped out from existing ports there. That plan would also potentially supply Asian markets.

Both the Biden and Trump administrations enthusiastically embraced the gas pipeline project, which Japan and Korea may help finance to increase their reliable supply of natural gas.

“The pipeline makes far more sense,” said Matthew McManus, who until April 2025 served as a deputy director at the State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources and is now at the National Center for Energy Analytics. “The Polar LNG project would face years of permitting and concerns about ties to Russia.”

Mr. Talkington, Polar LNG’s acting chief executive, said his company sought to seize “a generational opportunity to advance U.S. energy dominance, unlock profound benefits for the state of Alaska, and strengthen American Arctic navigation.”

The fact that discussions are even going on about using Russian equipment — and potentially a Russian-financed company — to move American natural gas to international markets is a further insult to Ukraine, and should not be a part of talks over a possible end to the war, said Ilya Zaslavskiy, a gas industry consultant who previously worked in Moscow and New York who now does research on Russian sanctions and energy issues out of Washington.

“Any approach by Novatek to transfer technology should be seen as a Kremlin attempt to co-opt U.S. policymakers in order to undermine U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and our allies,” Mr. Zaslavskiy said.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bolsonaro Accidentally Arrested by ICE Minutes After Arriving from Brazil

MIAMI (The Borowitz Report)— In an embarrassing misstep for the Department of Homeland Security, on Wednesday the failed Brazilian presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro was arrested by ICE agents just moments after he landed in Miami.

Bolsonaro, who had been expecting a warm welcome from his political ally, Donald J. Trump, appeared startled when seven immigration officers wrestled him to the ground and zip-tied him.

At a hastily-called press conference in Washington, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said that the agents mistook Bolsonaro for a Latino man they had chased earlier this week in a Home Depot parking lot.

“Initially, our brave ICE agents thought Mr. Bolsonaro with that suspect, who entered our country illegally to find work to feed his family,” Mullin said. “But once he offered proof that he was a fugitive money launderer, they let him go.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Court Blocks Strict New Rule for Medicaid Work Requirements

States had sued the Trump administration, arguing that a regulation would unlawfully cause very sick Americans to lose their coverage. A federal judge agreed.


By
Sarah Kliff and Margot Sanger-Katz for The New York Times

October 30, 2026

A federal judge on Thursday told the Trump administration that it could not move forward with a plan that would make it harder for seriously ill Americans to obtain or stay on Medicaid after work requirements take effect in January.

The ruling will apply in 25 states and the District Columbia, all of which sued to challenge the policy. Those states and Washington, D.C., which are led by Democrats, will now be free from penalties for any mistakes they make in determining who is too sick to be required to work.

The work requirement was enacted in the summer of 2025 as part of Republicans’ major tax and domestic policy legislation. It requires poor adults without disabilities to prove they worked, volunteered or attended school at least 80 hours a month in order to qualify for Medicaid or to keep their eligibility for the program.

The law created several exemptions from the work requirement, including one that said people who are “medically frail” would not have to meet the requirement to keep their coverage.

The Trump administration had chosen to interpret the exception very strictly. In June, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued a regulation saying a Medicaid recipient would need to offer not just proof of a serious medical condition, such as cancer or H.I.V., but evidence that the illness would “significantly impair” the person’s ability to work.

Judge Richard G. Stearns of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts found that the Trump administration’s narrow definition of medically frail did not follow the law, which listed five groups of people as medically frail, including those who are blind, have a disabling mental disorder, or have another complex medical condition.

The Trump administration, Judge Stearns concluded, had unlawfully winnowed down who fits into each of those groups by layering on the requirement that they also be too sick to work.

The federal government “lacked authority to exclude any subset of individuals in the five subcategories delineated as ‘medically frail’ by Congress,” Judge Stearns wrote, noting that the Trump administration’s rule could “lead to the disenrollment of otherwise eligible vulnerable individuals relying on Medicaid.”

A spokeswoman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services did not immediately respond to a question about whether the administrations planned to appeal.

Attorneys general of the states who brought the lawsuit expressed relief over the ruling.

“Today’s decision is a major victory that ensures that some of our most vulnerable residents are able to continue to access the health care they deserve,” said Rob Bonta, California’s attorney general and one of the plaintiffs.

Even with the new ruling, the Medicaid work requirement is still expected to lead to significant losses in coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that, based on the original law, around five million people would become uninsured because of the work requirement, including many people who were working but unable to handle the paperwork to prove it. Medicaid covers about 66 million Americans who are poor or disabled.

States have been racing to prepare for the new law by the end of the year. They must build systems to evaluate who qualifies for the law’s exceptions, and to measure the work hours of those who do not.

Before the regulation was published, many had been preparing lists of serious health conditions that could be automatically matched with applicants’ medical records.

Nebraska and Montana have enacted their work requirements early.

In addition to the District of Columbia, the states that brought the lawsuit were Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘MOTHER OF A MOVEMENT…And a Daughter of New Mexico

AND A DAUGHTER OF NEW MEXICO’

Community mourns legendary labor organizer Dolores Huerta

BY LOGAN ROYCE BEITMEN / ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

October 29, 2026

New Mexico native Dolores Huerta, an iconic labor organizer and activist, has died at the age of 96, sparking tributes across the country.

Huerta’s family made the announcement Wednesday morning in a Facebook post, requesting privacy and stating, “We know that many of you around the world share in our mourning, and we will be following up on plans to recognize and celebrate her incredible life and legacy.”

Huerta is best known for co-founding the National Farm Workers Association in 1962. Later known as the United Farm Workers, it was the first union for farmworkers in the United States.

The history of that movement had to be rewritten this March, when credible allegations surfaced that union co-founder Cesar Chavez raped and sexually abused underage girls. Huerta opened up about being sexually abused by Chavez, leading to the birth of two children, a secret she kept for 60 years and long after he died.

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham said at the time, “My heart goes out to my friend Dolores Huerta and anyone else who suffered abuse.” Lujan Grisham also noted that “the labor rights movement — built on respect for human dignity and collective power — is larger than any one individual.”

From the early 1970s on, Huerta’s life partner was Richard Chavez, Cesar’s brother, and together they had four kids. She also had seven children from two earlier marriages.

Huerta was born Dolores Clara Fernandez in 1930 in Dawson. Her father was a miner and union activist who went on to win a seat in the state Legislature. Her parents divorced when she was 3, and her mother took her and her brothers to California.

Immersed in a melting pot of Mexican, Filipino, African American, Japanese and Chinese working families, Huerta learned from her mother — who owned a restaurant and hotel — about independence, compassion and activism.

Huerta was a young, energetic elementary school teacher in the farm-rich San Joaquin Valley when she decided to answer another calling after growing frustrated by her students’ poor living conditions.

“I couldn’t stand seeing kids come to class hungry and needing shoes,” she said in a 2017 PBS “Independent Lens” documentary on her life. “I thought I could do more by organizing farmworkers than by trying to teach their hungry children.”

Throughout her life, Huerta consistently emphasized the power of the collective. In an interview with the Journal last April, she said the most difficult but most essential part of organizing is convincing ordinary people that they have the power to change things if they work together.

“Once people participate, then they learn, and it becomes part of them,” she said. “This is what we did with farmworkers, and what we still do in my foundation today. We go into communities, we have house meetings, we get them all together once we have the meetings, and then they decide what they want to improve within their community. And once they get involved, they go, ‘I can do this!’” That positive message is encapsulated in Huerta’s famous rallying cry, “¡Sí, se puede!,” or “Yes, we can!,” which became the motto of the UFW and has since been used by other activist groups.

Huerta’s work over the decades earned her a number of accolades, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor. When then-President Barack Obama presented the award in 2012, he praised Huerta as a tenacious leader and joked that he had stolen her slogan for his 2008 campaign.

Community leaders remember Huerta

LaLa Gonzales, the media and event coordinator for the New Mexico ¡Sí Se Puede! Committee, said Huerta dedicated her life to uplifting all voices and standing up for what’s right.

“Some experiences in life leave an imprint on your heart, and for me, having had the opportunity to work alongside Dolores Huerta … is one I will forever cherish,” Gonzales said. “… Her legacy is more than history. It is a living reminder of the power of perseverance, community and collective action.”

Nicolás Lell Benavides, Huerta’s cousin, composed an opera about her life, titled “Dolores,” which Opera Southwest performed at the National Hispanic Cultural Center last year. He said Huerta meant the world to him.

“I have looked up to her since I was a little boy,” Benavides said. “The thing that’s special about her is that she gave her time to make everybody feel special.”

Benavides said Huerta’s legacy is “very much alive” through the Dolores Huerta Foundation, which recently broke ground on a new cultural center in Bakersfield, California.

“The Dolores Huerta Foundation, which started in the early 2000s, is still training grassroots community organizers. It’s still pushing forward (with) getout- the-vote drives. There are still people canvassing in (California’s) Central Valley as we speak,” he said.

Huerta’s work earned her many accolades. She was the first Latina to be inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame and she’s received nine honorary doctorates from U.S. universities.

Schools are named in her honor in California, Texas and Colorado. Her image graces many murals, and streets bear her name — including in Albuquerque.

Huerta remained focused on organizing even in her final days, Benavides said.

“I was lucky to be with her and the family just a few days ago, and even then, the organizing was going on. The thing that was on her mind was, ‘Are people OK? Are things going to be OK?’ That’s just who she was, through and through,” he said.

Benavides said he hopes New Mexicans will honor Huerta’s legacy through civic engagement.

“This is an opportunity for everybody to do what she’s been asking, which is to get out and vote and take care of our country and our fellow citizens. That was the most important thing in the world to her,” Benavides said. “Let’s not mourn her by doing nothing but express our grief by going out and changing the world … That’s what she would want more than anything. If you really want to honor her, just get out and express yourself (at the voting booth). You only have a few days left to do it.”

Zach Quintero, the former executive director of the National Hispanic Cultural Center, first met Huerta at a campaign rally in Las Cruces when he was a teenager. He said it was a great honor to work with her in a professional capacity years later at the NHCC.

“We’re going to be mourning for quite some time, for sure, but she instilled in us a fighting spirit that can never be extinguished,” Quintero said.

An ofrenda for Dolores

On Wednesday afternoon, local politicians and community leaders gathered in Old Town Albuquerque to dedicate an ofrenda for Huerta at the gazebo on the Plaza.

After placing marigolds on the ofrenda, U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury, D-N.M., addressed the crowd: “We are here today to honor an icon, the mother of a movement here in New Mexico, a mentor, a loved one, and a daughter of New Mexico — the indomitable, the amazing, the fierce and the beautiful Dolores Huerta.”

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller spoke of Huerta’s deep and abiding connection to the city.

“It’s with nostalgia but also gratitude that we remember her last birthday. She spent it with us right here in Albuquerque. That was about nine months ago. There were at least 2,000 of us who sang happy birthday to her onstage at Civic Plaza — a day that was certainly powerful, but now a day that we will never forget,” Keller said.

Kel ler said Huerta remained a tireless fighter for freedom and justice throughout her life.

“We owe so much to Dolores. Whether it’s basic things like our minimum wage … what she did for the environmental movement, her championing of immigrant causes … (or) standing up against tyranny and fighting against things like the federal government trying to round up immigrants, or trying to crush a lot of the reforms that she fought for, she was strong all the way up until the end,” Keller said.

Javier Martínez, the speaker of the New Mexico House of Representatives, said he “fanboyed” over Huerta when he first met her at a sports bar in Detroit many years ago.

“I had the opportunity to meet her many times since, and her energy, commitment and love, not just for her people, but for all people, was palpable,” he said. “Her legacy will live on for generations to come … in the way of looking out for the most vulnerable and for working people everywhere.”

“How lucky were we … that we got to share space with her,” Martínez added. “And how lucky are we that this land of working people — the salt of the earth — is the land that gave birth to that icon.”

Alicia Romero, a historian who serves as Albuquerque Museum’s head curator, said Huerta left “a big wound in all of our hearts.”

“Like everyone else that we’ve heard from, I also had many times joyous memories with Dolores Huerta, the first time being at the Spanish Market in Santa Fe many years ago,” Romero said. “One of the things that I think made her so successful as a labor organizer was just her humility. Coming from a family in Dawson, New Mexico, raised by a humble Hispanic family, made her able to identify with and understand the many farmworker families she routinely engaged with in California, throughout the country, and throughout the world.”

Stansbury said the ofrenda will act as a public memorial.

“We invite the people of Albuquerque and New Mexico and the world to come share their thoughts and their memories and their offerings for her as she makes her passage to the other side,” Stansbury said.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

State Investment Council rejects senator’s call to divest from Musk firms

NM State Senator Jeff Steinborn urged sale after Musk limited Starlink service for Ukrainian military

BY TILLY ROBINSON / ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

October 29, 2026

The leader of New Mexico’s sovereign wealth fund on Monday rejected a state senator’s call to divest from Elon Musk’s companies, saying the New Mexico State Investment Council’s Musk investments were minimal and divestment could violate its fiduciary duties.

In an Oct. 22 letter, Sen. Jeff Steinborn, D-Las Cruces, urged the state agency to relinquish its holdings in Musk-linked investments following the technology mogul’s decision earlier this month to disrupt Starlink internet service in Ukraine.

“New Mexico should not profit from investments that help sustain Russia’s war against Ukraine, nor should our public funds support corporate conduct that jeopardizes Ukraine’s defense against that aggression,” Steinborn wrote in the letter.

State Investment Officer Jon Clark responded in a Monday letter, saying that eliminating the sovereign wealth fund’s exposures to Musk would require the SIC to divest from passive stock indexes, a potentially complex and expensive task.

The SIC has roughly $188 million invested in Musk’s firms, representing about 0.25% of the council’s $75 billion portfolio, according to Clark’s letter. The SIC is exposed to about $12.5 million in SpaceX, Starlink’s parent company, through its investment in the Russell 1000 index, which tracks the thousand largest American companies by market capitalization.

The SIC holds an additional $8 million in SpaceX through one of its managers, as well as $16.8 million through its private equity holdings. The fund’s investments in two Russell indexes also expose it to $147.3 million in Tesla stock. It holds nearly $3 million in Tesla debt through investments in one manager and two securities.

Through two of its managers, the SIC also holds $267,348 in Neuralink, a Musk company developing implantable technologies that connect human brains directly with computer systems.

The SIC invests revenue from the sales and leases of public lands, as well as oil and natural gas taxes, and uses a portion of the returns to support state services. Clark said the SIC’s ability to divest from Musk’s firms is constrained by the structure of its holdings and its duty to earn high, steady returns on investments made with public funds.

The SIC could direct active managers to invest in alternatives to Tesla and SpaceX, Clark wrote in his letter, but managers may not change their portfolios if they cannot find equivalents to the two firms.

Meanwhile, changes to the SIC’s passive investments — like the Russell indexes — could be even more difficult. Though the SIC could shift to customized passive portfolios that exclude Musk’s firms, the change might come with higher management fees and trading costs.

“The Council’s overriding legal and fiduciary responsibility is, without exception or political consideration, to optimize risk-adjusted returns for our beneficiaries, the majority of which are New Mexico school children and families,” Clark wrote in his Monday letter. “Paying more fees and/or earning lower financial returns for beneficiaries due to external considerations — no matter how worthy — is potentially a breach of fiduciary duty.”

Clark noted that New Mexico has divested in the past — from South Africa in the 1980s to protest apartheid, in 2007 from companies doing business with the Sudanese government during the genocide in Darfur, and in 2022 from Russia after it invaded Ukraine. But those decisions, Clark maintained in his reply to Steinborn, were “different instances, all with different details, factors and complications than what you are proposing today.”

Steinborn also asked in his Oct. 22 letter that the SIC review and “immediately cease” any investments in “Russian government securities, Russian-controlled businesses, and entities materially supporting Russia’s military operations.”

In a phone interview on Tuesday, Steinborn said he found Clark’s response “informative” but planned to press forward with his demands that the SIC divest from Musk’s firms.

“I appreciate that they promptly sent me that data. It was helpful in regards to Russia, but I think it also shows that our state does have investments in Starlink,” Steinborn said. “Therein lies my proposal — I do believe that we ought to be disinvesting from Starlink, pending a commitment from the company to never, ever, give a slowdown of services to Ukrainian armed forces trying to defend themselves from these human rights abuses.”

Ukrainian forces have relied on satellite internet from Starlink and its military-grade service, Starshield, for drone warfare, aerial defenses, and battlefield communications. But that dependence left them vulnerable when Musk limited Starlink’s speeds for more than a week this month, accusing Ukraine of misusing the platform.

“Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people,” Musk wrote in an Oct. 24 post on X. “That loophole was closed last week.”

Hours before Musk’s post, Ukrainian officials announced that Starlink and Starshield service had returned to their prior speeds.

Clark cited the reversal in his letter to Steinborn, writing that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s confirmation that Starlink was fully operational “is an important development in considering your request, while the reliability of that access remains a legitimate concern.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment