Famous New Mexico rock formation destroyed after torrential El Niño rains

Officials expected to investigate whether super El Niño storms in US south-west damaged the Alien Throne spires

Alien Throne at blue hour. Photograph: Kialo Winters / Navajo Tours USA.

By Lois Beckett for The Guardian

November 6, 2026

Undulating, gravity-defying rock spires are one of the most magical parts of the landscape of the US south-west.

But after torrential rainstorms linked to the super El Niño season, at least one famous rock formation in north-west New Mexico has been found in pieces.

And as local communities in the Four Corners region struggle with the aftermath of flooding, washed-out roads and damaged homes, more damage to the region’s natural wonders may still be discovered.

Kialo Winters was leading a tour of the Valley of Dreams trail in New Mexico, near the Ah-Shi-Sle-Pah Wilderness, on 30 October when he discovered that one of the area’s most famous spires, or “hoodoos”, had been destroyed.

“We turned the corner, and my heart just dropped,” he said. “The highlight feature that everyone wants to see is the Alien Throne.”

The majestic formation, which is featured prominently on a local tourism website, had broken into pieces. Winters said he immediately assumed that the heavy rains and the super El Niño season were to blame.

A week before, rainstorms and flooding had hit north-west New Mexico hard, forcing evacuations and hundreds of water rescues of stranded residents. In Farmington, the nearest town to the Valley of Dreams area, some families spent the night on rooftops watching the river flood their homes before they were rescued, officials said.

Winters has been guiding visitors to the region for 13 years as part of Navajo Tours USA, a company he founded. The rock spires, which are on Navajo Nation land, are beloved by visitors and photographers, but they also have a deeper significance to the region’s Indigenous residents, he said.

“They are traditional waypoints in our Indigenous history that have guided our people across the land for many generations,” Winters said.

And it was not just the Alien Throne that had tumbled down, Winters said. Another nearby formation, the King of Wings, what Winters called “the unicorn of hoodoos”, has also been damaged in recent weeks. Multiple user posts on AllTrails, a hiking website, suggested the formation had broken sometime before 9 October, before intense rains hit the region.

“Those are heavy losses for us,” Winters said. But, he added: “The land is alive, and we understand it changes. The same erosion that made them also brings them down, that is what our elders tell us.”

Winters called for visitors to the damaged spires to “let that site rest,” and not to climb what’s left of the formations, or take stones home for relics. “It’s illegal to do that,” he said, adding: “It’s disrespectful to the community as a whole.”

While his assumption is that the Alien Throne broke because of “natural causes”, Winters said, the Navajo Nation and the Bureau of Land Management are expected to examine the site and confirm the cause.

It’s not yet clear how much damage may have been done to other rock spires across the Four Corners region of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico during the past weeks of heavy rain and flooding. Park rangers at the Chiricahua, Goblin Valley, Gold Butte and Cathedral Gorge state and national parks with extensive “hoodoo” formations, told SFGate that they had not yet documented any damage.

In a super El Niño year of ongoing intense storms in the Pacific, famous rock formations across time zones are showing damage. Earlier in October, Hawaii’s centuries-old Hōlei sea arch collapsed into the Pacific.

“We’ll keep honoring those sentinels and waypoints through story and photographs and art installations,” Winters said of the lost formations on Navajo Nation land. “Their legacies live on.”

Project Jupiter air permit faces new delay

Citing volume of evidence, developer and state request more time before hearing

BY ALGERNON D’AMMASSA / ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

November 7, 2026

A crucial air quality permit for Project Jupiter faces a new delay as the New Mexico Environment Department and the developer behind the data center’s microgrid both asked the hearing officer to postpone a public hearing originally scheduled for Dec. 7.

Unanswered, for now, is when a public hearing will take place and by what deadline the state will make its decision. The state and the developer waived the previous deadline of Nov. 23 for a decision on the permit application.

Yucca Growth Infrastructure (YGI) is the entity behind the on-site power generation facility for the large-scale data center under construction in Santa Teresa for Oracle Corp. and OpenAI. The campus will, once completed, feature four data center structures supporting computer capacity for training AI software. The microgrid is designed to power the data center through natural gas-powered fuel cell technology.

On Tuesday, the Environment Department and YGI filed a joint motion asking permit hearing officer James Browning to vacate the Dec. 7 public hearing because, they said, more time was needed to complete a technical review of revisions to the project proposal submitted in October and to publish required public notices of a hearing.

At a Thursday hearing, Browning agreed to vacate the opening of the hearing but did not set a new date, instead ordering regular scheduling conferences. In an order issued Friday, Browning said the hearing would be rescheduled after the department’s Air Quality Bureau makes a recommendation.

At issue is the Environment Department’s previous position that the law permits it to extend the deadline for a decision only once, leaving the legality of another extension in question. Browning said in the hearing that it wasn’t a matter for him to decide.

The request by YGI and the Environment Department prompted New Energy Economy, the clean energy advocacy organization that has repeatedly argued the application is not ready for a fair hearing, to renew its request for the application to be dismissed in its present form.

The organization has argued that revisions to Project Jupiter’s power plan, including how to pipe natural gas to the location and changing details about the fuel cell array’s engineering and emissions, were not ready for a proper hearing. On Thursday, an attorney for New Energy Economy argued that the developers’ request for postponement was an acknowledgment that the application was not ready.

Browning again declined to dismiss the application, saying he did not have the technical evidence or authority for such an order. He also denied a motion from the Environment Department seeking disclosure requirements for expert witnesses. On Thursday, Browning expressed doubts that such an order was necessary.

“(The Environment Department) needs time to see if they can wade through Project Jupiter’s mountain of uncertainty,” Mariel Nanasi, New Energy Economy’s executive director, said in a comment for the Journal. Nanasi said the fuel cell array envisioned for the project, produced by Bloom Energy, “has no associated engineering studies, air modeling or other technical basis that professionals can rely on.”

Yucca Growth Infrastructure’s attorneys did not respond to a query from the Journal.

A spokesperson for Oracle said, “We look forward to moving efficiently toward a hearing date and schedule and fully expect NMED to treat our application with the same fairness it has afforded countless other applications approved with similar or higher emissions levels over the past months and years.”

Construction continues with thousands of workers reporting in shifts to the project site in Santa Teresa, where work began in September 2025.

Judge rules Yazzie-Martinez education reform plan insufficient

PED must submit a supplement by end of March 2027

BY NATALIE ROBBINS / ALBUQUERQUE OURNAL STAFF WRITER

November 7, 2026

A Santa Fe judge has ruled that the New Mexico Public Education Department’s plan to provide better schooling for underserved students is not sufficient, the latest development in an ongoing court case known as Yazzie-Martinez.

Judge Matthew Wilson issued an order Monday determining that the plan was not fully comprehensive because it failed to completely address all previous judicial orders in the case and did not include specific targeted services like summer school and reduced class sizes.

Though the court rejected the plaintiffs’ requests to completely rewrite the document or to dictate specific policies, the order requires that the PED submit a supplement by March 26. The supplement must explicitly connect the PED’s corrective actions to prior decisions and provide clear methods for measuring compliance in the future. The PED must also create a high-level overview to summarize how the state will fulfill its constitutional duty to provide an adequate education to underserved groups.

The 2018 Yazzie-Martinez court decision ruled that the state of New Mexico has a constitutional obligation to provide every student with an equal opportunity and a sufficient education,

especially Native American students, English-language learners, students with disabilities and economically disadvantaged students — all of whom make up around 70% of New Mexico’s student population, according to the Public Education Department.

The case began in 2014 when Wilhelmina Yazzie, the parent of a student at Gallup-McKinley County Schools, and Louise Martinez, the parent of an Albuquerque Public Schools student, joined other parents to file a lawsuit against the state.

In April 2025, Wilson ruled the PED had not done enough to improve since the landmark 2018 ruling and ordered a remedial plan. Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued in 1st Judicial District Court in September that the plan lacked clear timelines, measurable benchmarks and cost estimates, and that it did not contain sufficient input from tribal communities.

In a statement Friday, PED spokesperson Janelle Taylor García said the agency “welcomes” the court order, “which upholds the department’s action plan and confirms that the state is on the right path to meet its obligations to New Mexico’s students.”

“The court rejected plaintiffs’ arguments that the plan was fundamentally flawed because it lacked specific elements required by the court. The court also found that the state met its obligation to meaningfully consult with plaintiffs and stakeholders in developing the plan,” she said. “The court made clear that the plan’s content stands and does not need to be discarded.”

The court-ordered supplement to the plan is a “valuable roadmap,” she said.

“PED remains fully committed to delivering an excellent education for every New Mexico student, especially those the original case was brought to serve. This ruling allows us to keep moving that work forward.”

Melissa Candelaria, an attorney for the New Mexico Center for Law and Poverty representing the plaintiffs, said in a statement that plaintiffs appreciated the court’s ruling, but were disappointed that the order did not require PED to solicit input from experts, families, school districts, tribes and “the communities most affected by the state’s education system.” “Their perspectives and expertise are essential to understanding what students need and what it will take to fulfill the state’s constitutional obligations,” Candelaria said.

“We are hopeful that the incoming administration and new PED leadership will approach this as an opportunity for meaningful change, with a plan that addresses the full scope of the State’s constitutional obligations and provides students with the resources, culturally and linguistically relevant instruction, programs, and support they need.”

Candelaria said plaintiffs were ready to work with Gov.-elect Deb Haaland’s administration to resolve the case and repair New Mexico’s public education system.

In an interview with the Journal before the election, Haaland said that a resolution to the Yazzie-Martinez case “has been a long time coming.”

“We need to have a plan that will benefit these students and make New Mexico a leader in public education,” she said.

New Mexico poverty falls, but challenges remain

New Census figures show gains, especially for children, while state leaders debate how to build lasting financial independence

By James Bennett, managing editor of the Albuquerque Journal.

November 7, 2026

New Mexico has long struggled with one of America’s highest poverty rates.

It will be one of the top issues that Gov.-elect Deb Haaland will face as she moves into her new digs in Santa Fe.

But new Census Bureau figures reveal something encouraging: The state is making progress, particularly in helping children escape poverty.

The Times-Picayune in New Orleans recently reported that Louisiana topped the nation in poverty, raising an important question about how New Mexico compares.

According to Census figures covering 2023 through 2025, Louisiana’s official poverty rate was 19.6%, compared with 16% in New Mexico and 10.7% nationally.

That’s still roughly 1 in 6 New Mexicans living in poverty.

But those numbers don’t tell the whole story.

A remarkable improvement

New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Secretary Stephanie Schardin Clarke highlighted the state’s progress in an opinion column last week.

She wrote that New Mexico has “reduced poverty at triple the national rate” despite inflation and other economic pressures.

The state’s official poverty rate declined 1.2 percentage points, compared with a national improvement of 0.4 points.

The Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty Measure, which accounts for taxes, government assistance and living expenses, offers an even more encouraging picture.

Under that measure, New Mexico’s poverty rate falls to 13.2%, almost identical to the national average of 13%.

Louisiana’s supplemental rate remains at 19%.

The difference is especially dramatic for children.

New Mexico’s official child poverty rate is 20.9%. Under the supplemental measure, it drops to 10.9%, below the national rate of 13.5%.

Schardin Clarke points to New Mexico’s Child Tax Credit, which provided $138 million in relief to 255,000 families this year.

Those are encouraging numbers. But what do they really tell us about families’ long-term economic prospects?

“While we should all celebrate such a meaningful reduction in child poverty, this is no time to let off the gas,” Schardin Clarke wrote.

“New Mexico must keep investing in tax policy and programs that help those who need it most while creating durable jobs that grow our economy. That’s how we can achieve the goal of lifting every New Mexican out of poverty once and for all.”

Double-edged sword

Charles Sallee, director of the New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee, weighed in from a financial point of view.

“The supplemental poverty measure is a two-edge sword,” Sallee told the Journal.

It demonstrates that government assistance is reducing poverty, he said, but also that many families lack sufficient earned income to escape poverty without that assistance.

The ultimate goal, Sallee argues, should be helping families become financially independent.

He points to the federal Earned Income Tax Credit and New Mexico’s Working Families Tax Credit as examples of policies that reward employment.

Both provide additional financial support as eligible parents increase their earnings, with benefits gradually declining as incomes rise.

That creates what Sallee describes as a “softer landing,” avoiding the abrupt loss of benefits that can discourage families from earning more.

“Directionally they encourage eventual independence,” he said.

Sallee also questions how effectively some other programs reach the families most in need.

The Child Tax Credit, he said, primarily helps families near the poverty threshold cross that line under the supplemental measure.

“While the cash transfer helps, it doesn’t move the needle for families in deep poverty.”

Are we targeting assistance effectively?

Universal childcare could make it easier for parents to work and increase their earnings. But Sallee questions whether the growing investment will significantly reduce measured poverty.

He estimates that in 2019, roughly half of children receiving assistance were from families at or below the poverty level. He believes that share has fallen below 23%, although he cautioned that those figures need confirmation.

The program now extends to families regardless of income.

That raises a legitimate question about whether the state is directing enough resources toward families facing the greatest financial hardship.

Universal programs may provide broader benefits, including greater workforce participation. But those benefits should be measured alongside their cost and their effectiveness in reducing poverty.

The ultimate measure of success

New Mexico’s long-term challenge is creating enough good-paying jobs to help families become financially secure.

Our national laboratories, universities, energy industries and emerging quantum technology sector provide extraordinary opportunities.

But those investments must reach communities where poverty has persisted for generations.

That requires stronger schools, workforce training, affordable housing and policies that encourage businesses to create jobs.

The Journal’s Data Scoreboard is designed to measure whether New Mexico is making meaningful progress.

The latest poverty figures provide reasons for encouragement. Government assistance is helping families, especially children.

But we should measure success not only by how many families government programs lift above the poverty line, but also by how many can eventually remain there through their own earnings.

The ultimate measure of New Mexico’s prosperity isn’t how much assistance we provide. It’s how many families gain the opportunity to no longer need it.

Guarded Optimism, and Some Jokes, in Ukraine Over Trump’s Midterm Wipeout

Victory for Democrats could alter the course of peace negotiations and a war nearing its fifth year.

By Paul SonneAndrew E. Kramer and Marc Santora for The New York Times

November 6, 2026

As President Trump has moved the United States into greater alignment with Moscow, he has lashed out at the Ukrainian leader, Volodymyr Zelensky. “It’s time for Ukraine to get a new president,” Mr. Trump declared last month.

But after Democrats swept Tuesday’s midterm elections in an unequivocal repudiation of Mr. Trump, a joke circulated online in Ukraine: It seemed that it was the American people who wanted to get a new president.

This touch of humor underscored how wild American political swings have jarred Ukrainians. The United States was once Ukraine’s most important ally in the war. Then Mr. Trump returned to office, blowing hot and at times very cold on Kyiv.

“The general level of optimism in Kyiv and in Ukraine has risen as a result of these elections,” said Oleksandr Merezhko, chairman of the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian Parliament. “We believe that Congress will be a deterrent against attempts by Trump to make deals with Putin.”

But Mr. Merezhko cautioned that Ukrainians, looking for any good news against the bleak backdrop of Mr. Trump’s openly siding with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, shouldn’t be carried away with euphoria. “For us right now, it’s important not to forget about Republicans, not to hurt their feelings and to retain good relations with both parties,” he said.

The reality for Ukraine is that Mr. Trump has two years left in his term, and the country’s survival remains intertwined with the shifting political currents in Washington. With depleted air defenses and military ranks, Ukraine is expected to face its worst winter of the war in the coming months, as Russia takes aim at its civilian energy infrastructure. How exactly the midterms will affect the war and peace negotiations will depend in large part on the course Mr. Trump takes during his remaining time in office.

Mr. Trump said he met Thursday with the Kremlin envoy Kirill Dmitriev in Washington after a ceremony at the White House, attended by both Russian and Ukrainian officials, that honored the first lady, Melania Trump, for brokering a cease-fire and humanitarian mission in the Russian-controlled city of Oleshky in recent days. After meeting Mr. Dmitriev, Mr. Trump predicted a deal to end the war in Ukraine soon.

“It’s going to be a big agreement, and it’s going to involve more than Ukraine,” Mr. Trump said. “I could even say it might involve all of Europe. It’s going to be a big, beautiful agreement, and everyone’s going to be thrilled.”

Officially, Moscow has largely put on a neutral face over the election results ahead of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine that Mr. Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are expected to convene in Abu Dhabi next week.

“President Trump will continue to exercise his presidential powers,” the Kremlin spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, told reporters on Thursday. “President Trump will continue to pursue his foreign policy. Everything else, in our view, is an internal affair of the United States.”

Dmitri A. Medvedev, the former Russian president and current deputy chairman of the Russian security council, said on social media that Moscow must focus on smashing Ukraine on the battlefield until total victory was achieved.

“Donald Trump has suffered a crushing defeat in the battle for Congress,” Mr. Medvedev said. “How will this affect our interests? In the grand scheme of things, probably not at all — at least for now.”

Some Russian analysts expressed hope that the election result could represent a window of opportunity for a peace deal. Mr. Trump and his envoys, they argued, will have extra incentive to broker an agreement in the next two months, before a Democratic-controlled Congress takes over and stands in the way of a deal favorable to Russia.

It is possible that Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin will meet twice over that period — first this month on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Shenzhen, China, and then again next month at the Group of 20 summit in Miami.

But others in Russia see any hopes pinned to the next few months as wishful thinking. They lamented a political change that they said would inevitably reduce Mr. Trump’s power in his dealings with Moscow and his ability to deliver on what the Kremlin wanted in Ukraine.

“Now anything Donald Trump might propose will face roadblocks in America, and because of that, everything is going to be complicated for Trump in Ukraine,” Vladimir Solovyov, a top pro-Kremlin state news commentator, said on Wednesday.

In a video posted online, Mr. Solovyov called the midterm results a “triumph” for Mr. Zelensky.

“He avenged the humiliation in the Oval Office,” Mr. Solovyov said, referring to the Ukrainian president’s televised clash with Mr. Trump early last year. “He feels like a winner.”

Mr. Zelensky struck a balance in commenting on the election. Speaking to the German public broadcaster ZDF in his first comments after the vote, he expressed gratitude to the Republicans who had stood by Ukraine, but acknowledged the clear shift.

“The Democrats speak very clearly about supporting Ukraine and providing assistance to Ukraine,” Mr. Zelensky said. “They speak about renewing the connection between the United States and Europe.”

Mr. Zelensky expressed hope “that a balance of power will emerge and that we will receive more support.”

Open embrace of Democrats in Congress would be a misstep, said Volodymyr Ariev, a Ukrainian politician from the opposition European Solidarity party, as Mr. Trump still has broad leeway in foreign policy.

“We should not welcome a Democrat victory but welcome democracy in the United States,” said Mr. Ariev, a longtime backer of a strategy of bipartisan engagement in Washington.

“We should not be part of American elections,” he said. “Among Republicans there are a lot of Ukraine supporters.”

Ukrainians hope that congressional oversight will make the sweeping business deals with Russia at the heart of the Trump-led negotiations far less likely.

At a minimum, officials in Kyiv hope that a Democratic-led Congress will impose oversight on Mr. Trump’s push for a negotiated settlement, which many in Ukraine fear treats the war as an opening for commercial concessions to Moscow.

Lawmakers in Kyiv also anticipate congressional scrutiny into figures like the billionaire SpaceX founder Elon Musk over the throttling of Starshield satellite connectivity during Ukrainian military operations last month.

Already, American lawmakers in both parties have shown how they can use their power in Congress and at the state level to stymie Mr. Trump’s concessions to Moscow.

After the Starlink episode, Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, Republican of Pennsylvania, led a charge to hold SpaceX and the Defense Department accountable. He vowed to make sure that any U.S. officials involved would be punished and that federal funding would be withheld for any agency taking such an action.

Gov. Mikie Sherrill, Democrat of New Jersey, warned ports in the state that accepting Russian diesel fuel as a result of a deal between Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin would amount to a violation of the law. Ms. Sherrill pointed out that Mr. Trump did not have an unlimited ability to waive sanctions against Russia passed by Congress. According to a tracker launched by the environmental group Greenpeace, several tankers carrying Russian diesel have diverted, and no confirmed deliveries have taken place in the United States. Despite the guarded optimism in Kyiv, Ukrainian officials said the huge turnover in Congress reinforced the need to preserve the broad bipartisan support they had long cultivated.

The midterms brought notable losses to the pro-Ukraine coalition, including key allies like Mr. Fitzpatrick. Other important figures are also departing Congress, such as the veteran Republican senators Mitch McConnell and Thom Tillis, while many incoming members have yet to clearly articulate their positions on aid to Ukraine.

Ukrainians worry that Russia could assess the Trump administration, weakened after the midterms, as too ineffectual to lead peace talks. Ukraine has no alternative for now: Kyiv has encouraged European engagement in talks, but Russia has made clear that the United States is in the driver’s seat.

“There’s nothing to celebrate,” Oleksiy Honcharenko, a member of Ukraine’s Parliament with the opposition European Solidarity, wrote on social media. “The issue of peace will take a back seat” to infighting between Mr. Trump and the Democrats, he wrote. “Russia may abandon negotiations altogether.”

Tech Billionaires Face Tricky Political Waters After Democratic Sweep

Many donated money to President Trump’s favored causes and became his allies. Now that political alignment may be a liability.

By Eli Tan, Theodore Schleifer and Erin Griffith for The New York Times

November 5, 2026

In September, President Trump hosted a White House luncheon to discuss artificial intelligence, flanked by some of the world’s wealthiest tech executives: Jensen Huang of Nvidia, Elon Musk of Tesla and SpaceX, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta and others. They had the president’s ear to pitch an A.I. future uninhibited by regulation or guardrails.

For two years, it had been that easy to get what they wanted. Tech billionaires and their companies donated money to Mr. Trump’s favored causes, including the White House ballroom. The moguls posed for photos and lavished him with praise and gifts. Amazon heavily promoted a movie about Melania Trump.

Then on Tuesday, the American public delivered a rebuke of the tech industry’s agenda. Overnight, the billionaires’ political alignment with the president may have become a liability.

Democrats, riding a wave of anti-tech sentiment, including distrust of tech leaders, opposition to data centers and fears of job loss fueled by A.I., will soon control Congress and prominent state governments. In victory speeches around the country, they made tech titans avatars of inequality and corruption that plagued the Republican Party in the election cycle.

That puts some tech executives in a trickier position. It may be harder for them to make progress on their goals of A.I. dominance. Many saw their net worths drop on Thursday as investors sold out of A.I. and chip stocks, driving the tech-heavy Nasdaq down more than 5 percent. And some may even find themselves under investigation.

“You guys aren’t the actual leaders of the Valley. You’re the mis-leaders of the Valley,” said Reid Hoffman, a founder of LinkedIn who is one of the country’s top Democratic donors and a leader of the tech industry’s progressive wing. “It will no longer be that these MAGA voices in the Valley are in charge.”

Silicon Valley’s shift to the right began in 2024, when Mr. Musk and others went all-in on Mr. Trump, visiting Mar-a-Lago and taking up powerful positions in his administration. New political groups supporting niche interests like cryptocurrency spent enormous sums to promote their agendas.

This time, the money was even bigger. Among the 20 biggest donors in the midterms were tech billionaires, including the venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz.

An Andreessen-backed cryptocurrency group, Fairshake, spent tens of millions on a mission to defeat Sherrod Brown, the Democrat running for Senate in Ohio. Mr. Musk poured over $474 million into Republican super PACs, including hundreds of millions to support Ken Paxton, the Texas Republican nominee for the Senate. And a Musk-endorsed billionaire ran for governor in Ohio.

All three efforts failed.

Mr. Musk’s results, said Rohan Patel, a former Tesla vice president reporting to Mr. Musk who now works in Democratic politics, are a “total repudiation of his ugly brand of politics.”

Neil Malhotra, a professor of political economy at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business, said tech leaders had mostly been acting out of self-preservation.

“They understand when you have a president who is willing to use the state to intervene in the economy, it’s smart business practice to be on good terms with the administration,” he said.

Dr. Malhotra noted that most business leaders would rather that the government not move too far from the center in either direction. After the 2024 election, “Republicans overinterpreted their mandate,” he said.

Now, tech leaders may find their business dealings under investigation. “They are going to need to plant new forests for all of the subpoenas we’ll be printing,” Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, posted on social media on Tuesday.

The tech titans appeared triumphant in one race: A proposed billionaire tax in California is on the cusp of being defeated. Sergey Brin, a co-founder of Google, and other tech investors and founders poured about $330 million into efforts to vanquish the measure, which called for a one-time 5 percent tax. A companion measure that would effectively ban all future wealth taxes also appeared likely to pass.

Still, anti-billionaire and anti-tech sentiment was prominent in victory speeches around the country. Mr. Paxton’s opponent in Texas, James Talarico, whom Mr. Hoffman backed with nearly $17 million, compared his race to David versus Goliath.

“We just sent a message to every billionaire megadonor, every trillionaire megadonor,” he said. He called out “the billionaires who own the social media algorithms, who own the cable news networks, who own the politicians.” This election was a referendum on their power, too, he said.

Roy Cooper, a Democrat who won a Senate seat in North Carolina, said in his victory speech on Tuesday that “we told Washington loud and clear that North Carolinians will always matter more than the billionaires and the insiders.”

The left-wing victor in Michigan’s Senate race, Abdul El-Sayed, said he would be “taking on the corporations and the billionaires, special interests who’ve rigged the system against us for far too long.”

And Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat who won re-election in Georgia, called out “the titans of Silicon Valley,” who “dig bunkers for themselves and warn that the artificial intelligence they’re creating risks human extinction.”

Late Tuesday, as the results of the election rolled in, the hosts of the tech podcast “All-In,” who are tech investors, expressed surprise and disappointment in a livestream at the possibility that Texas’ Republican governor, Greg Abbott, could lose his bid for a fourth term.

The tech industry had assumed that after Mr. Abbott won, he would lift a moratorium on data centers in Texas and that construction would begin again, the “All-In” hosts said. Pro-business Texas is the second-largest state for data center projects, representing roughly 30 percent of the planned capacity for 2028, according to SemiAnalysis, a research group.

Gina Hinojosa, the Democrat who beat Mr. Abbott, has said she would keep the moratorium going until the state could pass legislation around data centers, delaying projects from coming online for many months.

Chamath Palihapitiya, an “All-In” host, connected the slowdown or halt of data center projects to the performance of A.I.-related stocks and, ultimately, the fate of the U.S. economy. He warned of a recession, noting that losing the computing power of new data centers was the “single most effective way to tank the market.”

Mr. Musk, who donated $5 million to Mr. Abbott’s campaign, posted on social media after the results: “Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now.”

After Governor Abbott’s Defeat, Houston’s Mayor Changes Course on ICE

Mayor John Whitmire has instructed Houston police to stop notifying immigration agents when they encounter someone without legal status during routine street stops.

By J. David Goodman for The New York Times

November 6, 2026

The stunning wave of Republican defeats is already having an effect in Texas.

Mayor John Whitmire of Houston said he was directing city police officers on Friday to limit their cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement during traffic stops, bucking a policy imposed on Texas’s largest city by Gov. Greg Abbott.

Under an executive order from the mayor, Houston police officers will no longer alert ICE agents when they encounter an unauthorized migrant during routine traffic stops or in connection with other low level infractions.

Instead, officers will only alert ICE in cases where a person has been arrested and is being brought to, or has already arrived at, a county jail.

“If they’re charged with a new crime, we’ll let ICE know as we get them to the jailhouse,” Mr. Whitmire said in an interview with The New York Times. “We just are not going to deal with the nonviolent contacts.”

The change in how Houston officers interact with immigration agents was a direct result of Tuesday’s election, Mr. Whitmire said. Mr. Abbott lost his bid for re-election to what would have been a record fourth term as governor.

“The governor was requiring us to contact ICE,” Mr. Whitmire said. “It created a lot of anxiety” among Houston residents.

He added that the shift was “certainly consistent with the new leadership in Austin,” referring to the slate of Democrats elected to every major statewide position in Texas on Tuesday.

“We won’t have new leadership until January,” Mr. Whitmire said. “But I’m willing to make a responsible decision that in the next two months we’re going to go to a more effective policy.”

A spokesman for Mr. Abbott’s office declined to comment.

The change comes as prosecutors in Harris County are pursuing a criminal case against an ICE agent who struck a Mexican construction worker in October with a vehicle in Houston, injuring him. A grand jury indicted the agent, Mario Alberto Morales, late last month.

The county’s prosecutors were also investigating the fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo who was killed during an encounter in July with ICE agents in Houston.

The Houston police chief, J. Noe Diaz, said he supported the mayor’s order. For his officers, he said, “it’s about treating the people that they come in contact with with dignity and not diminishing their vulnerability because they’re immigrants in our community.”

The mayor’s order described its intent, declaring that “law enforcement resources are finite” and are best used by “investigating and deterring violent crime.” The decision was made to maintain “the trust and cooperation of all residents” of the city, the order said.

“The fact that a person is, or is suspected to be, subject to immigration enforcement shall not, by itself, be a basis to contact ICE,” according to the order, reviewed by The Times. “If a person is not otherwise going to jail on new charges or other warrants, Department personnel shall not contact ICE regarding that person.”

In April, Mr. Abbott’s office threatened to pull $110 million in public-safety funding to Houston, including money for its police department, unless the mayor promised to stop enforcing a city ordinance and took steps to repeal it.

The ordinance directed city officers to hold people wanted by ICE no longer than necessary to complete a traffic stop or other brief street encounter.

City Council members who spearheaded the passage of the ordinance said at the time that the directive from Mr. Abbott’s office violated the Constitution by requiring officers to detain people beyond the time necessary for a police stop.

Though the ordinance had not been Mr. Whitmire’s idea, he voted for it. But after Mr. Abbott threatened the funding, he urged the council to adopt new language to comply with the governor’s demands, saying the city needed the state funding for its police and fire departments. The council ultimately complied with the governor.

Mr. Abbott lost his race to Gina Hinojosa, a state representative who will be the first Latina governor. Mr. Whitmire said that he had not discussed his decision directly with Ms. Hinojosa but had spoken with other newly elected Democratic leaders.

As mayor, Mr. Whitmire, a moderate Democrat and former longtime member of the state senate, has argued in the past that confrontations with the Trump administration over immigration enforcement were “counterproductive.” He has also pointed to his relationships with top Republicans in the State Capitol as an asset for the city.

“I had a good relationship with Abbott and the lieutenant governor,” he said in the interview, referring to Dan Patrick, a conservative Republican who also lost on Tuesday. “But I have even better relationships with the Democrats.”

Milwaukee Brewers Win First World Series. What Do YOU Think?

[From The Onion]

The Milwaukee Brewers clinched the World Series title over the Tampa Bay Rays in five games, marking the first championship in the franchise’s 57-year history. What do you think?

Evan Zmak, Canoeist

“The AA meetings in Milwaukee are going to be extra empty this weekend.”

Harry Rabanal, Handgun Refurbisher

“Not a baseball fan, but I’ll take any dent in Florida’s self-esteem.”

Viola Saxman, Bootblack

“Wow, they’ve all gotta be in their 80s by now.”

Pete Hegseth picks wrong week to stop drinking

[From the Duffel Blog]

Pentagon staffing delays leave secretary sober for worst 48 hours of his career

ARLINGTON, Va. — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth‘s pledge to stop drinking, first made to senators during his January 2025 confirmation, officially took effect at 0001 Tuesday after spending 21 months in the Pentagon staffing process, roughly 19 hours before the polls closed.

“The pledge was submitted on time,” said Lt. Col. Brandon Kessler, the secretary’s executive officer. “But it needed chops from Legal, Public Affairs, the Joint Staff, and three offices that no longer exist because he fired everyone in them. Then it sat in a SIPR inbox for eight months. By the time it routed back to the front office, the effective date was election night. Nobody could have predicted that.”

What followed, according to staff, was the longest 48 hours in the E-Ring since the leaked Signal chat that plagued Hegseth earlier this year.

By 2100 Tuesday, Democrats had taken the House. By 2300, they had flipped the Senate. Shortly after midnight, Texas turned blue, an event the secretary’s staff initially reported to him as a cyberattack.

Then came South Carolina’s 1st District, where voters elected retired Vice Adm. Nancy Lacore, whom Hegseth fired in 2025 after 35 years of service. Lacore will now help oversee the budget of the department that fired her, a career progression Navy detailers have quietly begun recommending to other flag officers.

“The secretary just stared at the map for a while,” said one staffer. “Then he asked if anyone had a nonalcoholic beer. Then he asked if 0.5% was technically a violation. Then he asked Legal to put that question in a staffing package, and Legal said they’d have an answer in roughly 21 months.”

Wednesday brought no relief.

By midmorning, reports surfaced that President Donald Trump had been asking advisers whether Hegseth should keep his job, with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis floated as a replacement.

The president then told reporters Hegseth was doing “a very good job,” a phrase Pentagon historians say carries roughly the same weight as a negative counseling statement.

Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie has promised articles of impeachment as soon as Congress returns next week, and North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis, who cast the pivotal vote to confirm Hegseth, said the secretary now faces “a reckoning.”

Officials say Hegseth responded the way he responds to all adversity: 300 push-ups, a rapid review of DEI in the Army Field Band, and a demand that the J-3 develop courses of action.

The resulting brief, which leaked via Signal chat, offered three:

COA 1: Weather the storm. Assessed risk: HIGH.

COA 2: Secure appointment to the Tennessee Senate seat being vacated by Marsha Blackburn. Assessed risk: MODERATE, pending Blackburn replying to his texts.

COA 3: Bourbon. Assessed risk: LOW. Not recommended (pledge in effect as of 0001 03NOV26).

The secretary also asked whether the election results could be revised the same way the department has revised its Iran war casualty figures, and was gently informed that the Associated Press does not report to him.

He spent much of the afternoon refreshing the Mississippi Senate race, where the Republican incumbent trailed by 65 votes, with the focus of a man who has not had a drink in 36 hours.

By late Wednesday, however, Legal had finally returned something useful: the pledge, as written, applies only while Hegseth serves as secretary.

“So he’s in a unique position,” Kessler said. “Every hour he survives in this job is another hour he can’t have a drink. He’s the first cabinet secretary in history with a personal stake in his own impeachment.”

At press time, Hegseth had called Massie’s office to ask whether the articles could be expedited.

Hegseth wears Eishenhower globe as Halloween costume

Secretary says historic artifact looks better without America’s allies

[From the Duffle Blog]

THE PENTAGON — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth won the Pentagon’s annual Halloween costume contest Friday after dressing as a globe once owned by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, transforming a priceless military artifact recently damaged by his staff into what aides described as a powerful statement of American military leadership.

The costume, dubbed “Pete the Planet,” featured the 30-inch globe with a large hole around Antarctica through which Hegseth could insert his body.

“Most people see a broken globe,” Hegseth reportedly told partygoers. “I see an opportunity to make the world great again.”

The idea came after members of Hegseth’s staff accidentally dropped the historic globe while attempting to move it into his office earlier this year. The collision punched a hole through Antarctica and detached the priceless artifact from its mount.

Rather than wait for professional conservators to repair the globe, Hegseth reportedly ordered his staff to enlarge the opening so he could fit inside.

“We spend billions defending those fucking penguins, and what have they ever done for us?” Hegseth asked.

Additional holes were cut through Greenland, Canada, most NATO countries and Taiwan to accommodate the secretary’s arms and allow him to flex his biceps during conversations with foreign military attachés.

Aides said they were careful to avoid damaging counties among some of America’s closest allies since January 2025, such as Russia, China, and North Korea.

“Secretary Hegseth believes in maintaining strong relationships with countries that understand strength,” one official explained. “Eisenhower was a great general, but he wasted a lot of time building alliances with weak-ass European nations.”

Ukraine was initially marked for removal, but Hegseth instead attached a miniature blinking Starlink satellite over the country.

“He likes being able to switch it on and off,” one aide said. “It makes him feel like he’s controlling the war.”

Staff also used a permanent marker to rename the Gulf of Mexico and Lake Michigan, though several attempts to draw the United States larger resulted in the accidental annexation of portions of the Atlantic Ocean.

Hegseth reportedly called the modifications “a much more accurate representation of the global security environment.”

The costume drew widespread praise at the Pentagon party, where attendees dressed as other things that frighten senior defense officials.

One Army colonel arrived as an unescorted reporter. A Navy captain dressed as a congressional subpoena. Another officer came as a major fresh from professional military education with a great idea.

“Somebody dressed as a spreadsheet of our current Patriot missile inventory and that was pretty terrifying,” said one attendee.

Military historians criticized the use of the Eisenhower globe, noting that the artifact represented decades of American military history and the strategic achievements of the Allied coalition during World War II.

Hegseth dismissed those concerns, arguing that Eisenhower would have appreciated the improvements.

“Ike understood warfighting and lethality,” he said. “But he never had the courage to cut ungrateful countries like Canada out of the picture.”

Officials said Hegseth intends to continue using the modified globe during national security briefings, where its missing sections will help illustrate the administration’s approach to international alliances.

At press time, the Army Corps of Engineers had received an urgent request to determine whether Plymouth Rock could be moved into Hegseth’s office before Thanksgiving.